This is precisely what I have been arguing and what I present as a
plausible alternative thinking to my students - platform cooperatives
which Trebir Schulz has been working on for instance - but that what we
need - is mainly some kind of non proprietary social networking
--because the underlying b
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:51 AM, carlo von lynX > I think we need distributed social networking, with nodes that act
> > like a Facebook on your own device but only interact through a network
> > of agnostic relays, Tor style, with zero external authorities. Not even
> > "trusted" people running s
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:51 AM, carlo von lynX
wrote:
I think we need distributed social networking, with nodes that act
like a Facebook on your own device but only interact through a network
of agnostic relays, Tor style, with zero external authorities. Not even
"trust
It is hard on Android and very hard on iOS to have a handset receive
unsolicited messages, which is the only way to avoid centralized
servers, even the rendezvous-only ones. This is by design. Tor is not
the solution because the number of exit nodes is many orders of
magnitude lower than the nu
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 07:44:03PM -0700, morlockel...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Open or closed software doesn't make much difference, it's all about
> data. An operator cannot 'open' data (like in letting everyone know
> what the data and its derivatives are) without factoring itself out
> of the busine
Den 20-03-2016 kl. 11:43 skrev Patrice Riemens:
original to:
http://sivertimes.com/richard-stallman-wants-to-destroy-facebook-to-protect-privacy/17274
original interview in Le Devoir (Montreal) (in French):
http://www.ledevoir.com/societe/actualites-en-societe/465389/eradiquer-facebook-pour-sau
Open or closed software doesn't make much difference, it's all about
data. An operator cannot 'open' data (like in letting everyone know
what the data and its derivatives are) without factoring itself out
of the business. On the other hand, there are (yet) no signs that
consumers will stop feeding
As to the Apple case, haven't people always been able to write
messages in cypher or just whisper them without government having
any right to force someone else to decode or to listen in? Does
the fact that now enciphering is a commercial service change that
fundamentally?
Patrice writes:
it is i
Open or closed software doesn't make much difference, it's all about
data. An operator cannot 'open' data (like in letting everyone know
what the data and its derivatives are) without factoring itself out
of the business. On the other hand, there are (yet) no signs that
consumers will stop feeding
> On Mar 20, 2016, at 6:43 AM, Patrice Riemens wrote:
>
> For Stallman, proprietary software is a fundamental obstacle to
> freedom since the editor is able to decide the content, functionality,
> impose censorship or deploy at will update.
I realize that this is a short interview, but I almost
original to:
http://sivertimes.com/richard-stallman-wants-to-destroy-facebook-to-protect-privacy/17274
original interview in Le Devoir (Montreal) (in French):
http://www.ledevoir.com/societe/actualites-en-societe/465389/eradiquer-facebook-pour-sauver-la-democratie
Richard Stallman wants to destr
11 matches
Mail list logo
