Re: nettime Fwd: The .art TLD again: E-Flux are soliciting support for their bid

2012-06-24 Thread Felix Stalder
The whole thing strikes me as utterly irrelevant, except for those who want to make a career or a business in some arcane layers of art administration connected to large institutional players. Art-Agenda art-age...@mailer.e-flux.com wrote: The structure of the internet is about to shift in

Re: nettime Fwd: The .art TLD again: E-Flux are soliciting support for their bid

2012-06-23 Thread Geert Lovink
Yes, this is all important but also local in a way. Art is an English word. So why not discuss .kunst? .amsterdam is clearly local. It was in fact bought by the city government, in fact to make money with this new gained symbolic monopoly. Dave Winer has argued on his blog against more TLDs in

Re: nettime Fwd: The .art TLD again: E-Flux are soliciting support for their bid

2012-06-22 Thread Flick Harrison
Is there really going to be some kind of thoughtful vetting process to get a .art domain? That seems rather dubious. If there's a stampede of thousands of folks on day 1, who is going to sift through those in a timely manner? Also, what legitimacy / status will be conferred upon the winners of

Re: nettime Fwd: The .art TLD again: E-Flux are soliciting support for their bid

2012-06-21 Thread Florian Cramer
Beginning in 1999 as an informal mailing list, e-flux is an artist-run organization that has grown tremendously over the past ten years, What is the legal form of e-flux? The information above, and on the 'about' page of e-flux.com, is remarkably vague. There is no indication that e-flux is a

nettime Fwd: The .art TLD again: E-Flux are soliciting support for their bid

2012-06-20 Thread Andreas Broeckmann
Original-Nachricht Betreff:The Art domain Datum: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:02:40 -0400 Von:Art-Agenda art-age...@mailer.e-flux.com *e-flux applies to develop the new .art internet domain* Dear Colleagues, We are writing to inform you about a new development