Very good question. And why is the NSA bad? I read their budged and I
liked it.
Am 26.10.2013 20:44, schrieb morlockel...@yahoo.com:
Why is surveillance bad? How does it affect one's life in unambiguous
terms? What really happens to the victims of surveillance?
They dont have to write CVs
Hallo August -
The current challenge, however, is first cultural, economic and
political, then technical. Unless we can set aside some institutional
support to build public electronic infrastructures that cater to users
without the data surveillance and without major pressure from industry
Original to:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/20/public-indifference-nsa-snowden-affair
John Naughton
The Observer, Sunday 20 October 2013
Edward Snowden: public indifference is the real enemy in the NSA affair
Most people don't seem to worry that government agencies
Let us hope that Daniel Solove is right, that the absence of public
outcry is the public saying I have nothing to hide, and that it is
not Dostoevsky's Grand Inquisitor saying In the end they will lay
their freedom at our feet and say to us, 'Make us your slaves, but
feed us.'
--dan
#
The real problem is quantifying the consequences, the danger and
negative outcomes of the surveillance.
Why is surveillance bad? How does it affect one's life in unambiguous
terms? What really happens to the victims of surveillance?
Do they get less income/benefits in the future?
Do they buy
Original to:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/20/public-indifference-nsa-snowden-affair
John Naughton
The Observer, Sunday 20 October 2013
Edward Snowden: public indifference is the real enemy in the NSA affair
Most people don't seem to worry that government agencies are
hey, patrice,
thank you for posting this wonderful article.
it may be that the sheer volume of data reportedly being collected seems an
absurd amount to read and so an impossible task even for machines to scan
that it can't be taken seriously. that said, does it really matter? a
surveillance state
