Hello MP,
Here is a link provided by Daniel Verhoeven which provides some good
initial background; David Harvey in Rebel Cities has some more extensive
materials.
https://niepleuen.wordpress.com/2015/01/15/introduction-to-the-commons-and-some-definitions/
allan
# distributed via nettime: no
Dear Salvatore,
I understand that this was a manifesto - or a draft manifesto - but,
aside from the fuzziness surrounding the use of the concept of the
commons (a critical issue), what remains problematical to me is the
manner in which the digital commons, as you envision it, is connected
or
hi
On 23/01/15 18:58, allan siegel wrote:
or meshes in some form with the real world. In its earliest historical
and political manifestations the commons was not simply a common
territory (if you will) but also the embodiment of an ideological
principle.
Can you elaborate on this?
Which
Hello,
Since this announcement has been cross-posted I???ll add Daniel
Verhoeven response to this as well as my own.
FROM DV:
Dear All,
A good start would be to define ?commons?. The fuziness about the
commons is ubiquitous, not the commons. See for a proposal:
On 21/01/15 18:06, allan siegel wrote:
A good start would be to define ?commons?. The fuziness about the
commons is ubiquitous, not the commons. See for a proposal:
https://niepleuen.wordpress.com/2015/01/15/introduction-to-the-commons-and-some-definitions/
Commons are as
Dear all,
sorry for crossposting: I think it could be of interest to many of us
here.
--
Ubiquitous Commons and Stakhanov at transmediale festival in Berlin.
here
