Fully agree with Andreas
nina
I agree.
Sascha
On Mon, August 27, 2012 8:59 am, Keith Sanborn wrote:
I would prefer not to have them on Nettime. I believe they abuse the
function of the list, which has been a reasonably civil exchange of ideas,
insights, intuitions, fads and nonsense.
One way to look at it is from the viewpoint of information symmetry. When a
forum revolves purely around ideas, then once the idea comes into the public
domain of the forum everyone has an equal relationship to it. So the forum is
founded on high levels of information symmetry. Monetary
Posts asking for money always have the same point - money - and this uniformity
does not seem compatible with nettime.
It hurts the entropy.
# distributed via nettime: no commercial use without permission
# nettime is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text
I think Keith's response is phrased particularly well. A conversation that does
not overtly involve money is still funded in some way … otherwise there would
be no way to use a network to send it and receive it and we would not have the
leisure to participate.
To keep the list supposedly
folks,
first, in my experience, nothing takes 5-10 secs, and even if it does,
there are always at least 24 instances of this which makes it 2-4 mins,
plus x. (i think that proposals like keith's should come with a donation
of personal time to get such simple routines started.)
second, maybe
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:30:51AM -0400, Owen Mundy wrote:
I wrote a review of an online performance staged during Transmediale this
year. Here is an excerpt and link:
Thanks a lot for sharing this, Owen, it was very thought-provoking;
it was wonderfully framed. Issues of privacy and data
2-4 minutes times 4,000 is 130-260 brain-hours, at average 10W/brain it comes
to 1.3-2.6 KWh. Human energy source is more expensive than electricity, so this
is likely $15-30 hard cash per moneyspam considering only energy costs. If you
add maintenance, housing and lost brain cycles, it goes
I was incredulous myself. Google Remenlink report and you will find the numbers
are closer to 6,000 involuntary terminations of life
On Aug 28, 2012, at 9:47 AM, Karin Spaink ka...@spaink.net wrote:
On Aug 28, 2012, at 06:12 , martin hardie wrote:
he figures i refer to were from the first
Crowd-sourcing is a form of advertising based on an appeal to social
pseudo-solidarity. Unlike other speech acts on this list, it has carries a
Bingo, Keith! I think this hits on imho the most repugnant disturbing aspect
-- the under-lying intense ego-centricity of social media hyping in
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the positive response.
This is an important point you make below; that we've become accustomed to the
conveniences we receive in exchange for giving up aspects of our private lives.
Would these services actually cease to exist if tracking was forbidden? Maybe
Google
10 matches
Mail list logo
