So there was a purely political decision to build in the asymmetries.
Can you corroborate, beyond the mere assertion? Who? When? Evidence
welcome. IB
On Jul 27, 2015, at 8:28 PM, morlockel...@yahoo.com wrote:
The Internet *is* it's lowest protocol layers. The ideology and
politics are
Hi all, I'm glad to see the interview is being circulated, especially
as I still worry it's too technical for most readers. And certainly,
the design of TCP/IP was very political - Andrew Russell talks about
the historical details in his book Open Standards. I've been working on
an
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:28 PM, [1]morlockel...@yahoo.com wrote:
The Internet *is* it's lowest protocol layers.
No, it isn't, since it is neither immaterial nor a perpetuum mobile,
but runs on hardware and electricity.
-F
...
# distributed via nettime: no commercial use
Am 28.07.2015 um 17:44 schrieb Florian Cramer fcra...@pleintekst.nl:
The Internet *is* it's lowest protocol layers.
No, it isn't, since it is neither immaterial nor a perpetuum mobile,
but runs on hardware and electricity.
Touché, but in fact it is the network protocols that
On 28/Jul/15 02:56, Iain Boal wrote:
So there was a purely political decision to build in the asymmetries.
Can you corroborate, beyond the mere assertion? Who? When? Evidence
welcome. IB
Good question -- I don't think there is such a thing as 'purely political'
decisions -- that would
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:11 PM, t byfield tbyfi...@panix.com
wrote:
Via RISKS http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/28.81.html
http://loriemerson.net/2015/07/23/whats-wrong-with-the-internet-
and-how-we-can-fix-it-interview-with-internet-pioneer-john-day/
  loriemerson
