ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
> Performance for the scalar multiplication primitives seem to be slower
> than secp384 and slightly faster than secp521, and looking at point
> addition, it's slower than secp521. I hope that will be improved a quite
> a bit with an optimized mod
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos writes:
> I got pinged by someone testing the performance of TLS handshakes and
> it seems that gnutls/nettle with RSA is significantly slower than
> openssl.
To quote the NEWS file for Nettle-3.4.1:
Performance regression:
* All RSA private key operations
Daiki Ueno writes:
> Thank you. By the way, one thing I realized in my past rebase attempts
> is that, this commit doing the final reduction of a value by mod q seems
> to be incorrect for curve448 and should probably be reverted:
>
> commit 6cf6abd68eb3d6c8c8e5ab217be734f9c537037f
>
ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
> Daiki Ueno writes:
>
>> From 8bc6e735d4b40cbab5e187a28e01b63a04ecd92b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Daiki Ueno
>> Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 17:26:18 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] Implement Curve448 primitives
>>
>> This patch adds the necessary
On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 13:24 +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> Hi,
> I got pinged by someone testing the performance of TLS handshakes and
> it seems that gnutls/nettle with RSA is significantly slower than
> openssl. On the other hand, secp256r1 and ed25519 are faster. (btw.
> both openssl
Hi,
I got pinged by someone testing the performance of TLS handshakes and
it seems that gnutls/nettle with RSA is significantly slower than
openssl. On the other hand, secp256r1 and ed25519 are faster. (btw.
both openssl and gnutls/nettle are slower than rusttls). Nevertheless
the RSA caught my
