пт, 10 янв. 2020 г. в 23:01, Niels Möller :
>
> Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov writes:
>
> > So did I at the time of writing a patch, finding no actual users of
> > these functions. I think it is fine to drop them without bumping
> > soname.
>
> It seems none disagrees with that. I've merged all three
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov writes:
> So did I at the time of writing a patch, finding no actual users of
> these functions. I think it is fine to drop them without bumping
> soname.
It seems none disagrees with that. I've merged all three patches to the
master-updates branch for testing.
Thanks,
Hello,
вт, 7 янв. 2020 г. в 23:20, Niels Möller :
>
> dbarysh...@gmail.com writes:
> > From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> >
> > There is no need to keep optimized ECC functions in public namespace
> > (nettle_*), move them to internal namespace (_nettle_*).
>
> I agree this rename makes sense.
>
>
dbarysh...@gmail.com writes:
> From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>
> There is no need to keep optimized ECC functions in public namespace
> (nettle_*), move them to internal namespace (_nettle_*).
I agree this rename makes sense.
But it could be considered an ABI break, since we remove symbols
