Re: How to deal with unsupported wpa_supplicant parameters?

2016-01-28 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 09:50 +0100, Toby wrote: > Hi, > due to a delay in the upgrade of our corporate radius servers, I > temporarily need to deactivate TLSv1.2 in phase1 of WPA2/EAP-PEAP, to > bypass a conflict with wpa_supplicant >=2.4. (known issue) > In wpa_supplicant.conf this would require a

How to deal with unsupported wpa_supplicant parameters?

2016-01-28 Thread Toby
Hi, due to a delay in the upgrade of our corporate radius servers, I temporarily need to deactivate TLSv1.2 in phase1 of WPA2/EAP-PEAP, to bypass a conflict with wpa_supplicant >=2.4. (known issue) In wpa_supplicant.conf this would require a parameter phase="tls_disable_tlsv1_2=0". But this

Re: [PATCH] simplify blob handling

2016-01-28 Thread Thomas Haller
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 22:57 +0100, Matthias Berndt wrote: > Hi, > > here's the patch to simplify blob handling. merged: https://git.gnome.org/browse/network-manager-openvpn/commit/?id =4a94aa814f26bad03e1277b1d0d978deadb129ae Thank you! Thomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: How to deal with unsupported wpa_supplicant parameters?

2016-01-28 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 17:58 +0100, Toby wrote: > I fully understand that this specific TLS1.2 issue is temporary and > doesn't > need to be addressed specifically. But there are many more > wpa_supplicant > parameters not covered by the settings spec, and there might be even > more > in upcoming

Re: How to deal with unsupported wpa_supplicant parameters?

2016-01-28 Thread Toby
I fully understand that this specific TLS1.2 issue is temporary and doesn't need to be addressed specifically. But there are many more wpa_supplicant parameters not covered by the settings spec, and there might be even more in upcoming releases. NM will always lag behind to some extend. Therefore,