On 02.04.2016 23:16, Thomas Haller wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-04-02 at 21:49 +0200, Stjepan Groš wrote:
>> I have one problem now. Namely, function _is_root in NMNetns doesn't
>> work, or am I doing something wrong? When constructing
>> NMNetnsController object the first NMNet
On 30.03.2016 17:26, Thomas Haller wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
6. Certain aspects of NMManager are global for every network
namespace, others are not. For example, sleeping state (or should
it
be separate for every network namespace so that some network
namespaces can be suspended?).
On 29.03.2016 14:10, Thomas Haller wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 13:13 +0200, Stjepan Groš wrote:
>> On 29.03.2016 12:52, Thomas Haller wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2016-02-27 at 09:34 +0100, Stjepan Groš wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>> Hi Stjepan,
>>>
>>> afte
On 29.03.2016 12:52, Thomas Haller wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-02-27 at 09:34 +0100, Stjepan Groš wrote:
>> Hi!
> Hi Stjepan,
>
> after the changes done to master, I took your MIF branch, and re-merged
> master into it. The result is here:
>
> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/Ne
it into account.
Thanks,
Stjepan Groš
Forwarded Message
Subject:[mif] New Charter Items?
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:32:07 -0500
From: Margaret Cullen
To: m...@ietf.org List
At the last MIF meeting, and later on the mailing list, we reached consensus
tha
Hi!
I just commited to my repository
(https://github.com/sgros/MIF_NetworkManager) functionality that allows
VPN's with virtual devices to be isolated within a separate network
namespace. For that purpose there are the following parameters within
connection section of VPN configuration file:
netn
On 21.02.2016 16:39, Thomas Haller wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 18:12 +0100, Stjepan Groš wrote:
>> On 20.02.2016 00:39, Thomas Haller wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 12:21 +0100, Stjepan Groš wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> Is anyone working on
On 20.02.2016 00:39, Thomas Haller wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 12:21 +0100, Stjepan Groš wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Is anyone working on network namespaces support in NetworkManager? Or
>> was thinking what is a "proper way" of implementing them?
>>
>>
On 04.02.2016 17:12, Thomas Haller wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 12:21 +0100, Stjepan Groš wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Is anyone working on network namespaces support in NetworkManager? Or
>> was thinking what is a "proper way" of implementing them?
> Nobody is c
Hi!
Is anyone working on network namespaces support in NetworkManager? Or
was thinking what is a "proper way" of implementing them?
I'm experimenting with adding support to NM and what I implemented so
far is:
1. Added objects NMNetnsController which would control all network
namespaces managed
On 01.10.2015 19:02, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 12:44 +0200, Stjepan Groš wrote:
>> Hi Lubomir,
>>
>> after some time I'm sending followup on this. I would like to flesh out
>> and discuss our ideas before we start implementing them to be certain
On 28.09.2015 13:11, Xen wrote:
> Just want to say that I have been trying (in OpenSUSE) to get a rather
> simple scenario working, but failed, probably due to kernel mechanics:
>
> - main connection receives all traffic destined for port 80, 443.
> - VPN receives all else.
>
> I just consider it a
On 28.09.2015 11:48, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 12:05 +0200, Stjepan Groš wrote:
>> Two colleagues of mine and I started to work on MIF implementation on
>> Fedora. In case someone doesn't know, IETF MIF working group (
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org
09-07 at 12:05 +0200, Stjepan Groš wrote:
>> So, it seems to me that the NetworkManager is the core component on the
>> client side that will have to have functionality specified by MIF
>> allowing node to use multiple connections in parallel (this, of course,
>> doesn
problems?
Best regards,
Stjepan Groš
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
15 matches
Mail list logo
