On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 14:59 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> Review appreciated, especially from Pavel. I don't really like the
> added parameter to nm_ipX_config_commit() but it's actually simpler code
> than the alternatives, and we don't really want these routes in the main
> IPXConfig objects beca
Review appreciated, especially from Pavel. I don't really like the
added parameter to nm_ipX_config_commit() but it's actually simpler code
than the alternatives, and we don't really want these routes in the main
IPXConfig objects because (a) they are transient and not really part of
the connectio
