Re: Approaching NetworkManager 1.2

2015-11-23 Thread Dan Williams
On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 10:02 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, Dan Williams wrote: > > > Again, if you can get dispatcher debugging that would be great. > > Slaves > > should never have IP information *unless it's been added externally > > to > > NM* by something, since they are

Re: Approaching NetworkManager 1.2

2015-11-21 Thread Olaf Hering
On Fri, Nov 13, Dan Williams wrote: > Again, if you can get dispatcher debugging that would be great. Slaves > should never have IP information *unless it's been added externally to > NM* by something, since they are slaves. I think the VPN route error happend with gsm. This week the reconnect

Re: Approaching NetworkManager 1.2

2015-11-13 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 2015-11-13 at 21:38 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > > If anyone believes anything important is missing it's a good time > > to > > speak up now. > > The interface for scripts in /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/ is in > a > poor state. IMO there are

Re: Approaching NetworkManager 1.2

2015-11-13 Thread Olaf Hering
On Tue, Nov 03, poma wrote: > Please bring the bridges back to network-manager-applet! Thanks for finding this... The current way of how things are broken is that even if a bridge is active the GNOME GUI still wants to manage a "cabled connection". But instead of actually doing that it tries to

Re: Approaching NetworkManager 1.2

2015-11-13 Thread Olaf Hering
On Mon, Nov 02, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > If anyone believes anything important is missing it's a good time to > speak up now. The interface for scripts in /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/ is in a poor state. IMO there are likle two ways how third party apps interact with NM: either they receive

Re: Approaching NetworkManager 1.2

2015-11-11 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 18:02 +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > Hello everyone, > > It's been some time since the work on NetworkManager 1.2 has begun. A > lot of what's been planed has been implemented and we believe we > should > wrap up the work and do a major release. > > The wiki page with 1.2

Re: Approaching NetworkManager 1.2

2015-11-06 Thread Tore Anderson
* Dan Williams > I wouldn't get rid of "Automatic (Addresses only)" since this is what > enables you to ignore DNS servers/routes and use your own. Actually, contrary to to what you'd intuitively expect, that method does *not* ignore receive routes. Only DNS servers are ignored. The only

Re: Approaching NetworkManager 1.2

2015-11-05 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 07:53 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote: > * Lubomir Rintel > > > If anyone believes anything important is missing it's a good time to > > speak up now. > > A couple of suggestions: > > 1) IPv6 method cleanup: >* Get rid of «Automatic (DHCP only)» >* Get

Re: Approaching NetworkManager 1.2

2015-11-03 Thread Tore Anderson
* Lubomir Rintel > If anyone believes anything important is missing it's a good time to > speak up now. A couple of suggestions: 1) IPv6 method cleanup: * Get rid of «Automatic (DHCP only)» * Get rid of «Automatic (Addresses only)» * Replace «Ignore» with «Disabled»,

Approaching NetworkManager 1.2

2015-11-02 Thread Lubomir Rintel
Hello everyone, It's been some time since the work on NetworkManager 1.2 has begun. A lot of what's been planed has been implemented and we believe we should wrap up the work and do a major release. The wiki page with 1.2 feature page has been updated with the features we're like to see in the