* Tore Anderson
> Now, my own mobile provider (or probably more correctly, the GGSN vendor
> used by my mobile provider) does assume that mobile nodes adhere to the
> spec. Because of this, it will unicast the RAs it emits to the
> link-local address it expects the mobile node to have configured (
* Pavel Simerda
> I don't have an IPv6-enabled PPP connection right at hand but I think
> I've seen a working setup without one. But I'm not going to set up
> one right now, so there's no point in arguing over that. I guess the
> simple fact that you technically don't need link-local addresses for
a dinner.
- Original Message -
> From: "Bjørn Mork"
> To: "Pavel Simerda"
> Cc: "Tore Anderson" , networkmanager-list@gnome.org, "Dan
> Winship"
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 3:20:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Disabling ip4 and IPV
- Original Message -
> From: "Dan Winship"
> To: "Pavel Simerda" , "Tore Anderson"
> Cc: networkmanager-list@gnome.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 3:39:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Disabling ip4 and IPV6 on F20RC1
>
> On 12/17/201
- Original Message -
> From: "Tore Anderson"
> To: "Pavel Simerda"
> Cc: "Dan Winship" , networkmanager-list@gnome.org
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 12:10:15 AM
> Subject: Re: Disabling ip4 and IPV6 on F20RC1
>
> * Pavel Simerda
* Pavel Simerda
> There's no correct handling of RA lifetimes until the standards are
> fixed, anyway. That is something I feel much more motivated for, so
> if you want to discuss that with me, feel free. A wiki page might be
> useful for that.
The Linux kernel handles RA lifetimes correctly and
On Sun, 2013-12-15 at 06:37 +0100, Robert M. Albrecht wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my system has a built in ethernet interface wich is working perfectly
> fine on IPV4 and IPV6.
>
> I added a second interface via usb for wiresharking some stuff (this way
> I don't get my own traffic in the packet dumps).
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Tore Anderson"
> To: "Pavel Simerda" , "Bjørn Mork"
> Cc: "Dan Winship" , networkmanager-list@gnome.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 5:36:48 PM
> Subject: Re: Disabling ip4 and IPV6 on F20RC1
>
* Pavel Simerda
> But unfortunately we need to be a little bit careful about the theory
> written down on paper and the actual needs. Linux has the long
> history of allowing more than just blind following of what's written
> down. And I'm not the only person who repeatedly proved that IPv6
> stan
Hi Pavel,
But if link local still remains where is the difference between
disabling IPV6 or enabling and choosing link local configuration only ?
In released versions of NetworkManager, there isn't any possibility to disable
IPv6 link-local addresses. In fact it's not properly supported even i
On 12/17/2013 06:01 AM, Pavel Simerda wrote:
> 2) But setting disable_ipv6 doesn't really work as expected. See [1] and
> especially the note about disable_ipv6 below the table. The truth is that
> this also wouldn't affect the original poster's use case where the specific
> interface is (hopefu
Pavel Simerda writes:
>> This is a protocol
>> requirement. Ref e.g. RFC 4291:
>>
>>2.8. A Node's Required Addresses
>>
>>A host is required to recognize the following addresses as
>>identifying itself:
>>
>> o Its required Link-Local address for each interface..
>> [etc]
Pavel Simerda writes:
>> > 1) First of all it doesn't *specifically* disable kenrel link-local
>> > addresses allocation but performs some magic to disable a couple of
>> > IPv6 features at once. This wouldn't be a problem in the original
>> > poster's case as he wants to disable IPv6 anyway.
>>
- Original Message -
> From: "Bjørn Mork"
> To: "Pavel Simerda"
> Cc: "Tore Anderson" , networkmanager-list@gnome.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 2:00:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Disabling ip4 and IPV6 on F20RC1
>
> Pavel Simerd
- Original Message -
> From: "Tore Anderson"
> To: "Pavel Simerda"
> Cc: networkmanager-list@gnome.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 12:19:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Disabling ip4 and IPV6 on F20RC1
>
> * Pavel Simerda
>
> > 1) First of
Pavel Simerda writes:
>> > there isn't any possibility to disable IPv6 link-local addresses. In
>> > fact it's not properly supported even in the kernel.
>>
>> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/$DEVICE/disable_ipv6 works for me?
>
> 1) First of all it doesn't *specifically* disable kenrel link-lo
* Pavel Simerda
> 1) First of all it doesn't *specifically* disable kenrel link-local
> addresses allocation but performs some magic to disable a couple of
> IPv6 features at once. This wouldn't be a problem in the original
> poster's case as he wants to disable IPv6 anyway.
As I understand it, l
- Original Message -
> From: "Tore Anderson"
> To: "Pavel Simerda"
> Cc: networkmanager-list@gnome.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 10:57:28 AM
> Subject: Re: Disabling ip4 and IPV6 on F20RC1
>
> * Pavel Simerda
>
> > ther
* Pavel Simerda
> there isn't any possibility to disable IPv6 link-local addresses. In
> fact it's not properly supported even in the kernel.
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/$DEVICE/disable_ipv6 works for me?
Tore
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert M. Albrecht"
> To: networkmanager-list@gnome.org
> Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 6:37:16 AM
> Subject: Disabling ip4 and IPV6 on F20RC1
>
> Hi,
>
> my system has a built in ethernet interface wich is working
Hi,
my system has a built in ethernet interface wich is working perfectly
fine on IPV4 and IPV6.
I added a second interface via usb for wiresharking some stuff (this way
I don't get my own traffic in the packet dumps).
I don't want or need an IP-stack on this second interface.
In network manag
21 matches
Mail list logo
