Re: NM and IETF MIF working group

2015-10-01 Thread Stjepan Groš
On 28.09.2015 13:11, Xen wrote: > Just want to say that I have been trying (in OpenSUSE) to get a rather > simple scenario working, but failed, probably due to kernel mechanics: > > - main connection receives all traffic destined for port 80, 443. > - VPN receives all else. > > I just consider it

Re: NM and IETF MIF working group

2015-10-01 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 22:29 +0200, Stjepan Groš wrote: > On 28.09.2015 11:48, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 12:05 +0200, Stjepan Groš wrote: > >> Two colleagues of mine and I started to work on MIF implementation on > >> Fedora. In case someone doesn't know, IETF MIF working

Re: NM and IETF MIF working group

2015-10-01 Thread Dan Williams
On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 12:44 +0200, Stjepan Groš wrote: > Hi Lubomir, > > after some time I'm sending followup on this. I would like to flesh out > and discuss our ideas before we start implementing them to be certain > that they will be useful for NetworkManager users. > > On 07.09.2015 18:10,

Re: NM and IETF MIF working group

2015-10-01 Thread David Woodhouse
> On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 22:29 +0200, Stjepan Groš wrote: >> On 28.09.2015 11:48, David Woodhouse wrote: >> > On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 12:05 +0200, Stjepan Groš wrote: >> >> Two colleagues of mine and I started to work on MIF implementation on >> >> Fedora. In case someone doesn't know, IETF MIF

Re: NM and IETF MIF working group

2015-10-01 Thread Stjepan Groš
On 01.10.2015 19:02, Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 12:44 +0200, Stjepan Groš wrote: >> Hi Lubomir, >> >> after some time I'm sending followup on this. I would like to flesh out >> and discuss our ideas before we start implementing them to be certain >> that they will be useful for

Re: NM and IETF MIF working group

2015-10-01 Thread David Woodhouse
> On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 22:29 +0200, Stjepan Groš wrote: >> On 28.09.2015 11:48, David Woodhouse wrote: >> > On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 12:05 +0200, Stjepan Groš wrote: >> >> Two colleagues of mine and I started to work on MIF implementation on >> >> Fedora. In case someone doesn't know, IETF MIF

Re: NM and IETF MIF working group

2015-09-28 Thread Stjepan Groš
On 28.09.2015 11:48, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 12:05 +0200, Stjepan Groš wrote: >> Two colleagues of mine and I started to work on MIF implementation on >> Fedora. In case someone doesn't know, IETF MIF working group ( >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/mif/charter/) tries to

Re: NM and IETF MIF working group

2015-09-28 Thread Xen
Just want to say that I have been trying (in OpenSUSE) to get a rather simple scenario working, but failed, probably due to kernel mechanics: - main connection receives all traffic destined for port 80, 443. - VPN receives all else. I just consider it a more special case of directing VPN

Re: NM and IETF MIF working group

2015-09-28 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 12:05 +0200, Stjepan Groš wrote: > > Two colleagues of mine and I started to work on MIF implementation on > Fedora. In case someone doesn't know, IETF MIF working group ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/mif/charter/) tries to solve the > problems of a single node having

NM and IETF MIF working group

2015-09-07 Thread Stjepan Groš
Hi All! Two colleagues of mine and I started to work on MIF implementation on Fedora. In case someone doesn't know, IETF MIF working group (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/mif/charter/) tries to solve the problems of a single node having multiple parallel connections to different destinations

Re: NM and IETF MIF working group

2015-09-07 Thread Lubomir Rintel
Hello Stjepan, On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 12:05 +0200, Stjepan Groš wrote: > Hi All! > > Two colleagues of mine and I started to work on MIF implementation on > Fedora. In case someone doesn't know, IETF MIF working group > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/mif/charter/) tries to solve the > problems