-- Forwarded message --From: Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Jun 23, 2006 10:20 PMSubject: Re: nm-edit? Static entries?
To: Robert Love [EMAIL PROTECTED]When implementing this, please also make a delete profile (or whatever you want to call it) button. I had this new unsecured
Vincent wrote:
When implementing this, please also make a delete profile (or whatever
you want to call it) button. I had this new unsecured network I could
connect to, which after a few days all of a sudden is secured. Now
everytime I login and this network is spotted it askes for a password I
On Wed, June 21, 2006 8:18 pm, Dan Williams wrote:
So; I think at the moment, the plan is this [1]:
[1] some bits are up for debate
I don't know about debate but a thought or two
You have mentioned worry that some parts of the core code are
starting to experience some bloat eg. the
Antony J Mee wrote:
More immediately, the static IP config stuff could be
implemented quite trivially as yup ... you've guessed it...
a ~cough~ VPN ~cough~ plugin. The architecture provides a
neat dbus interface precisely to set 'static' IP4Config,
routing information etc. one some
I am new to NM and first I just want to say WOW What a great project!.
I am hoping that something like the nm-edit suggestion below is in the
works or is already implemented. I don't have a very good knowledge of
the inner workings of NM so I would like to ask all of you if there is
something
Jeff Moore wrote:
I am hoping that something like the nm-edit suggestion below is in the
works or is already implemented. I don't have a very good knowledge of
the inner workings of NM so I would like to ask all of you if there is
something in place that would allow an individual to statically
2006/6/21, Pat Suwalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jeff Moore wrote: I am hoping that something like the nm-edit suggestion below is in the works or is already implemented. I don't have a very good knowledge of the inner workings of NM so I would like to ask all of you if there is
something in place
Quoting Pat Suwalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jeff Moore wrote:
I am hoping that something like the nm-edit suggestion below is in the
works or is already implemented. I don't have a very good knowledge of
the inner workings of NM so I would like to ask all of you if there is
something in place
2006/6/21, Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Pat Suwalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Jeff Moore wrote: I am hoping that something like the nm-edit suggestion below is in the works or is already implemented. I don't have a very good knowledge of
the inner workings of NM so I would like to ask all
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 12:14 -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote:
Jeff Moore wrote:
I am hoping that something like the nm-edit suggestion below is in the
works or is already implemented. I don't have a very good knowledge of
the inner workings of NM so I would like to ask all of you
Next up, do we want people to be able to add a Network? If so, the nicest implementation (with the least amount of duplicated code) would
be to have nm-applet listen to a dbus message asking it to pop up the add network dialog.For now, I'd ignore this.I think could be a usefull characteristic,
Daniel Espinosa wrote:
What about to have the oportunity to disable the DHCP of each
connection, then you can allow the user to store static IP's for each
network and save this data to a gconf key.
I'm all for it, but it has to be implemented in the applet before an
editor could take advantage
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 15:54 -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote:
I've decided to take you up on this. If nothing else, so that I can
mooch BEvERages off of you at OLS (you're coming for the kernel summit,
I take it?). :)
I actually don't know yet. It is a sore point.
If I am in Ottawa, we drink!
Robert Love wrote:
Before I get too far on the interface, I want to solidify some things.
First, only WEP keys are actually stored in human-readable form (the way
the user entered them). So, I can't think of a nice way to let users
handle something like WPA-PSK, unless nm-applet also stored
On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 02:34 -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't see wpa passphrases stored. I see the output of
what the supplicant's wpa_passphrase would output, a rather long hex key.
Oh, sorry. I thought you meant nothing was stored in the keyring.
Correct, we only stored the
15 matches
Mail list logo
