On Thu, 2021-06-03 at 17:44 +0200, Beniamino Galvani wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 07:17:31AM +, Samuel Le Thiec via
> networkmanager-list wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > For a moment I thought that Network Manager may be assuming a
> > point-to-point topology
> > for
> > the VPN instead of the
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 07:17:31AM +, Samuel Le Thiec via
networkmanager-list wrote:
Hi,
> For a moment I thought that Network Manager may be assuming a point-to-point
> topology for
> the VPN instead of the "topology subnet" as specified in the server.conf, so
> I did try to
> 'push
On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 21:52 +, Samuel Le Thiec via networkmanager-list
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 13:27 +, Samuel Le Thiec via networkmanager-list
> wrote:
> > Note: sorry for the potential duplicate email, I sent it before & after
> > having
> > registered to the list!
> >
> >
Hello again:)
I don't know why this would be needed, but I noticed this can be worked around
by pushing
the route towards the server-ipv6 subnet from the openvpn server, with the
directive:
push "route-ipv6 2001:bc8:3d1d:1337::/64"
I can totally live with that, but is it the expected
Note: sorry for the potential duplicate email, I sent it before & after having
registered
to the list!
Hello all,
I have a working openvpn config (see below) which I can't get to fully work
with Network
Manager: the private IPv6 network is not accessible when connecting to the VPN
with NM(*).
Hello all,
Please, make sure to CC me in your replies so I'm sure to get them!
I have a working openvpn config (see below) which I can't get to fully work
with Network
Manager: the private IPv6 network is not accessible when connecting to the VPN
with NM(*).
Here is what I get for tun0 when
