Re: ipv6 method=shared ?

2018-04-06 Thread Tore Anderson
* Thomas Schäfer > My problem was/is, that NetworkManager requests > a prefix and an address in case of > "O-flag" + DHCPv6-DNS+IA_PD, but not M-flag Sounds like a bug. Well, technically it's not illegal to request an IA_NA even though it hasn't seen M=1, but failure to obtain an address

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] platform: add support for WireGuard links

2018-04-06 Thread Thomas Haller
Hi, On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 15:45 +0100, Javier Arteaga wrote: > > > I wonder, what happens if the wireguard module is not loaded > > initially. > > I guess, caching the family-id is right, but you need to retry if > > it's > > not avilable. For example, in wireguard_get_link_properties() > >

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] platform: add support for WireGuard links

2018-04-06 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
> If you have two identically configured wireguard interfaces, their > NMPObjectWireguard instances should compare equal. Not sure how relevant this is to the use case here, but you could have identical responses coming from different namespaces, since the interface counter starts over for new