| China Will Not Back U.S. on
Immunity from New Court Fri Jun 18, 2004 04:54 PM ET By Evelyn Leopold UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - China said on Friday it would abstain on a resolution giving the United States immunity from the new International Criminal Court, a decision that may leave Washington short of votes to pass the resolution. "I said to my colleagues we will abstain," Beijing's U.N. ambassador, Wang Guangya, told Reuters after a luncheon among the 15 Security Council members and U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan. Wang said earlier the resolution would send a wrong signal in light of the Iraqi prisoner abuse scandal. China's abstention could deprive the Bush administration of the nine "yes" votes required to adopt a resolution. So far only Britain, Russia, Angola and the Philippines are considered sure votes in favor. All other members are contemplating an abstention or are undecided, following a rebuke by U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, who said on Thursday the resolution was "wrong," would "discredit the council" and was of "dubious judicial value." He said that resolution "would be a very unfortunate signal to send at any time -- but particularly at this time." On Friday Annan distributed a memorandum to council members, "strongly" urging them not to renew the measure. "The secretary-general believes that extending the exemption once more would contradict the efforts of the United Nations -- including the council itself -- to promote the rule of law in international affairs," the memorandum said." The United States, for the third year, is seeking to renew a U.N. Security Council resolution that would exempt from the court's prosecution military and civilian personnel "related to a U.N.-authorized operation" such as that in Iraq. The immunity would be extended to all nations not among the 94 countries that have ratified a treaty establishing the court, set up to prosecute the world's worst atrocities -- genocide, mass war crimes and systematic human rights abuses. "We're going to be coming back to the council by Tuesday with a final plan -- with our position in terms of next steps," said U.S. representative Stuart Holliday. "Our position remains the same," he said. The resolution was first adopted in 2002 after the United States began to veto U.N. peacekeeping missions. ABU GHRAIB IMPACT The United States is investigating the abuse of prisoners by the U.S. military in Iraq, particularly in the large Abu Ghraib jail, and in Afghanistan. Among the 15 council members, Germany, France, Spain, Brazil, Chile, Benin, Romania and now China are expected to abstain, diplomats said. Pakistan and Algeria were undecided. The Chinese position is unusual because Beijing has not signed or ratified the court's treaty. Diplomats believe it was also related to disputes with Washington over Taiwan, although Beijing envoys have denied it. Algerian Ambassador Abdallah Baali, whose "yes" vote had been considered certain, said his government had not decided. "Obviously the Americans don't have the nine votes. The secretary-general's statement was quite strong and apparently the Abu Ghraib situation had an impact," said Baali, the only Arab member of the council. The Bush administration is opposed in principle to an international court having any jurisdiction on American soldiers abroad and has signed 89 bilateral agreements to exempt any American officials. Based in The Hague, Netherlands, the tribunal is a court of last resort. Analysts say it would not, for example, interfere in the abuse of Iraqi prisoners as long as a country's judicial system probed the allegations. | |
|
| |
| © Copyright Reuters
2004. All rights reserved. Any copying, re-publication or re-distribution
of Reuters content or of any content used on this site, including by
framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without prior written
consent of Reuters.
Quotes and other data are provided for your personal information only, and are not intended for trading purposes. Reuters, the members of its Group and its data providers shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the quotes or other data, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. © Reuters 2004. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world. |
