[nfs-discuss] mount.nfs: access denied by server

2009-08-26 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 08:21:45PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 18:37 -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: > > Looking at code we have > > ... > > Sorry. I didn't mean to force you into detailed explanations of the > code. As a NetApp employee, I'm not sure I'm licensed to even

[nfs-discuss] mount.nfs: access denied by server

2009-08-25 Thread Trond Myklebust
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 18:37 -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 07:20:16PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > I was thinking of the case in which /foo/bar is not actually a mount > > point. :-) > > Looking at code we have > > nfs4_secinfo_recov() -> >nfs4_secinfo_v

[nfs-discuss] mount.nfs: access denied by server

2009-08-25 Thread Trond Myklebust
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 17:17 -0500, Tom Haynes wrote: > Trond Myklebust wrote: > >> Should it recover in the case where the administrator suddenly removes > >> krb5 from the list, and replaces it with krb5i on all subdirectories > >> of ../../.. relative to your current working directory? > >>

[nfs-discuss] mount.nfs: access denied by server

2009-08-25 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 07:20:16PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > I was thinking of the case in which /foo/bar is not actually a mount > point. :-) Looking at code we have nfs4_secinfo_recov() -> nfs4_secinfo_vnode() -> nfs4_secinfo_fh_otw() -> secinfo_update()

[nfs-discuss] mount.nfs: access denied by server

2009-08-25 Thread Tom Haynes
Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 14:39 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > >> On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 13:17 -0500, Tom Haynes wrote: >> >>> Trond Myklebust wrote: >>> On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 11:49 -0500, Tom Haynes wrote: > With OpenSolaris NFSv3,

[nfs-discuss] mount.nfs: access denied by server

2009-08-25 Thread Trond Myklebust
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 14:39 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 13:17 -0500, Tom Haynes wrote: > > Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 11:49 -0500, Tom Haynes wrote: > > > > > >> With OpenSolaris NFSv3, there is no autonegotiation. With NFSv4, we > > >> support

[nfs-discuss] mount.nfs: access denied by server

2009-08-25 Thread Trond Myklebust
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 13:17 -0500, Tom Haynes wrote: > Trond Myklebust wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 11:49 -0500, Tom Haynes wrote: > > > >> With OpenSolaris NFSv3, there is no autonegotiation. With NFSv4, we > >> support the autonegotiation > >> as defined in the protocol. > >> > >> We jus

[nfs-discuss] mount.nfs: access denied by server

2009-08-25 Thread Tom Haynes
Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 11:49 -0500, Tom Haynes wrote: > >> With OpenSolaris NFSv3, there is no autonegotiation. With NFSv4, we >> support the autonegotiation >> as defined in the protocol. >> >> We just went through a regression with this algorithm. >> > > NFSv4 al