[nfs-discuss] nfs anon option

[Helen Chao]

On 11/30/2008 1:06 PM, Lakshminarayanan Sundareswaran wrote:
> Could you pls explain in detail? I'm using Solaris 10 and I've set the 
> nfs domain (NFSMAPID_DOMAIN) on both the server and client to be the 
> same. I even tried hashing out this value from /etc/default/nfs from 
> both server and client but still no use.

Yes, for Solaris 10 the property is set in /etc/default/nfs file.
Did you restart the nfsmapid after changing the value?

[nfs-discuss] nfs anon option

[Narain]

Could you pls explain in detail? I'm using Solaris 10 and I've set the nfs 
domain (NFSMAPID_DOMAIN) on both the server and client to be the same. I even 
tried hashing out this value from /etc/default/nfs from both server and client 
but still no use.
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org

[nfs-discuss] nfs anon option

[Helen Chao]

On 11/30/2008 12:47 PM, Narain wrote:
> I was recently testing the anon option on nfsv4 whereby i want to map 
> anonymous user requests from the client to a predefined user on the server. 
> Unfortunately even after using the anon option on the server side, files on 
> the client are owned by use "nobody" only. Can anyone tell me what I'm 
> missing here?
>   

It probably is the un-matching NFS mapid domain from client
and server.  If you are using Opensolaris, run this command :
   # sharectl get -p nfsmapid_domain nfs
and make sure the value for this property is same for client and
server.

-- 

Thanks,
Helen

[nfs-discuss] nfs anon option

[Narain]

I was recently testing the anon option on nfsv4 whereby i want to map anonymous 
user requests from the client to a predefined user on the server. Unfortunately 
even after using the anon option on the server side, files on the client are 
owned by use "nobody" only. Can anyone tell me what I'm missing here?
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org