I have a first pass that works and passes pynfs! It isn't quite correct in
that a rename into a directory or a create doesn't invalidate the dirent
cache and thus a readdir might not show the new file.
Unlink and rename out of a directory need not invalidate and should work
properly.
Also left to
>From Frank Filz :
Frank Filz has uploaded a new change for review. (
https://review.gerrithub.io/350076
Change subject: Get rid of unused cookie field in struct
mdcache_populate_cb_state
..
Get rid of unused cookie field in
>From Frank Filz :
Frank Filz has uploaded a new change for review. (
https://review.gerrithub.io/350080
Change subject: Fix FSAL_PSEUDO to return the cookie for the NEXT entry for
each dirent
..
Fix FSAL_PSEUDO to return the
>From Frank Filz :
Frank Filz has uploaded a new change for review. (
https://review.gerrithub.io/350077
Change subject: Add glist_next_entry function to get the next item in a glist
..
Add glist_next_entry function to get the
>From Frank Filz :
Frank Filz has uploaded a new change for review. (
https://review.gerrithub.io/350078
Change subject: Add dirent chunking configuration
..
Add dirent chunking configuration
Change-Id: I6868dc899db6732488e67
>From Frank Filz :
Frank Filz has uploaded a new change for review. (
https://review.gerrithub.io/350079
Change subject: Add glist_last_entry
..
Add glist_last_entry
Change-Id: Id206255b2bffd558438981e267f1849bfae69597
Signed
>From Frank Filz :
Frank Filz has uploaded a new change for review. (
https://review.gerrithub.io/350081
Change subject: WIP Add directory chunking for readdir.
..
WIP Add directory chunking for readdir.
This still needs dire
>From Daniel Gryniewicz :
Daniel Gryniewicz has uploaded a new change for review. (
https://review.gerrithub.io/350056
Change subject: SAL - Keep a pointer to the obj owning the state
..
SAL - Keep a pointer to the obj owning
> On 02/22/2017 04:53 AM, patrice.lu...@cea.fr wrote:
> > Hi Frank,
> >
> >
> > As I said yesterday during our last concall, I realized that the
> > current FSAL_PROXY use the v4 protocol and not the v4.1. My previous
> > submitted patchs to implement support_ex assumed FSAL_PROXY was
> using v4.1
>From :
madhu.punj...@in.ibm.com has uploaded a new change for review. (
https://review.gerrithub.io/349969
Change subject: release file sys after file sys is unclaimed
..
release file sys after file sys is unclaimed
Currentl
On 02/22/2017 04:53 AM, patrice.lu...@cea.fr wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
>
> As I said yesterday during our last concall, I realized that the current
> FSAL_PROXY use the v4 protocol and not the v4.1. My previous submitted
> patchs to implement support_ex assumed FSAL_PROXY was using v4.1.
>
>
> Consider
Hi Frank,
As I said yesterday during our last concall, I realized that the current
FSAL_PROXY use the v4 protocol and not the v4.1. My previous submitted
patchs to implement support_ex assumed FSAL_PROXY was using v4.1.
Considering differences in v4 and v4.1, I don't see how doing a
"trunca
12 matches
Mail list logo
