I'm assuming not in 2.5.0, since that's due out this week. So 2.6-dev,
but if we get the compatibility right, I see no reason why it can't be
backported to 2.5.x. (or maybe even 2.4.x if necessary...)
Daniel
On 05/23/2017 08:26 AM, supriit singh wrote:
> I was talking about the file
I was talking about the file /etc/sysconfig/ganesha. In SUSE packaging,
generally service file is expected to be same as package name. So, to
use "ganesha" is a bit problematic.
Other than that, I think only logs are using the name "ganesha". As
discussed in last concall, the only issue with
