On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 11:26 AM, William Allen Simpson
wrote:
> On 7/21/17 11:17 AM, Matt Benjamin wrote:
>>
>> As we discussed Wed., I'd like to see something like a msg counter and
>> byte counter that induced switching to the next handle. This seems
>> consistent w/the front or back queuing i
On 7/21/17 11:17 AM, Matt Benjamin wrote:
As we discussed Wed., I'd like to see something like a msg counter and
byte counter that induced switching to the next handle. This seems
consistent w/the front or back queuing idea Dan proposed.
I don't understand this comment. We already have the
As we discussed Wed., I'd like to see something like a msg counter and
byte counter that induced switching to the next handle. This seems
consistent w/the front or back queuing idea Dan proposed. The
existing lookahead logic knows when we have reads or writes, but
doesn't know how much we read, w
