There are currently no changes in the Ceph side.
Daniel
On 07/05/2017 09:56 AM, Supriti Singh wrote:
So at the moment the direction is more to use pacemaker/corosync and
each FSAL its own way to handle the client state in shared storage.
Looking at storhaug, it seems like the plan is to use the
So at the moment the direction is more to use pacemaker/corosync and each FSAL
its own way to handle the client state in
shared storage. Looking at storhaug, it seems like the plan is to use the same
resource agent for both gluster and ceph
(cephfs and rgw) backend. We need to point to different
> CMAL is dead. There wasn't enough interest in it, and the majority of it's
> features are provided by whatever clustered filesystem is backing Ganesha.
CMAL is dead, long live CMAL!
What came out of the CMAL effort was a couple things:
1. The dBus interface we have for clustering (takeip, rel
Hi, Supriti.
CMAL is dead. There wasn't enough interest in it, and the majority of
it's features are provided by whatever clustered filesystem is backing
Ganesha.
There are plans underway to extend the FSAL APIs to support more
features required by HA. It's unlikely that we'll ever be able
Hi Mark,
I have looked into storhaug. I was trying to use the resource agents, "ganesha"
and "ganesha_trigger". But just for
active-passive configuration, I used systemd resource agent for now.
Thanks,
Supriti
--
Supriti Singh��SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imend��rffer, Jane Smithard, Gra
