On 3/9/17 10:22 AM, Matt Benjamin wrote:
>> From: "William Allen Simpson"
>> After a somewhat loud discussion with Matt, we've agreed on a
>> different approach. This will also be useful for fully async IO
>> that is planned for V2.6.
>
> Um, I don't think this statement represents either of the
>> Nothing as invasive as queuing changes should go
>> into 2.5. 2.5 should get the dirent chunking and bug fixes only at this
>> point.
Agree with Dan. Let us put out 2.5, and have these fixes for 2.6.
Regards, Malahal.
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> On 03/09/2017
Hi Bill,
- Original Message -
> From: "William Allen Simpson"
> To: "NFS Ganesha Developers"
> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2017 2:44:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] dispatch queues
>
> On 3/8/17 5:34 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> >
On 03/09/2017 02:44 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> On 3/8/17 5:34 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
>> Ganesha currently has 2 phases of dispatch queuing: one for input and
>> decoding, then another for executing/encoding output. (I've fixed the
>> third queue for later sending the output, wher
On 3/8/17 5:34 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> Ganesha currently has 2 phases of dispatch queuing: one for input and
> decoding, then another for executing/encoding output. (I've fixed the
> third queue for later sending the output, where the thread should stay
> hot as long as there's more to
