I haven’t actually done much with the pNFS portion of Ganesha, however I can
try and point you in the right direction…
You will need to implement the following FSAL methods for sure:
layoutget
layoutreturn
layoutcommit
getdeviceinfo
fs_ds_addr_size
fsal_pnfs_ds (assuming Ganesha will be
On 04/04/2016 11:32 AM, Frank Filz wrote:
>>>
>>> @@ -691,6 +486,7 @@ state_status_t layoutrecall(struct fsal_module
> *fsal,
>>>
>>> /* Free the recall list resources */
>>> destroy_recall(recall);
>>> + obj->obj_ops.put_ref(obj);
>>>
>>> return rc;
>>>}
>>
Hi Tushar,
There's no one specific thread, no, but as a project, we're interested in
continuous performance improvement.
Can you provide details of your setup and workload for reference?
Matt
- Original Message -
> From: "Tushar Shinde"
> To: nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> On 04/01/2016 07:50 PM, Frank Filz wrote:
> > @@ -344,19 +134,20 @@ static cache_inode_status_t update(struct
> > fsal_module *fsal,
> >* @return STATE_SUCCESS or errors.
> >*/
> >
> > -static state_status_t lock_grant(struct fsal_module *fsal,
> > +static state_status_t lock_grant(struct
Hi,
as far as I know this container is running in privileged mode according to:
cat /proc/self/uid_map
0 0 4294967295 menas priviledge, right?
but I am sure you are right, but have no idea how to confirm what is the
problem and how to change it.
thanks,
Csaba Dobo
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016
Makes sense.
Frank, I have a basic FSAL backend working, but what would be the easiest way
to have my FSAL implementation enable PNFS? That is, I want the client to ask
me which machine my file lives on.
Looking at the gluster code for a few hours now and it's not entirely obvious
to me as to h
Hi,
I am facing issue that NFS v4 Ganesha is slower than kernel v4 server. I
found it about 20-30 percent slower.
Anyone know any patch/mail thread discussing this problem?
Thank you,
Tushar
--
__
On 04/01/2016 07:50 PM, Frank Filz wrote:
> @@ -344,19 +134,20 @@ static cache_inode_status_t update(struct fsal_module
> *fsal,
>* @return STATE_SUCCESS or errors.
>*/
>
> -static state_status_t lock_grant(struct fsal_module *fsal,
> +static state_status_t lock_grant(struct fsal_export *ex
Hi,
inline
- Original Message -
> From: "arun kumar"
> To: "Matt Benjamin"
> Cc: nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "William Simpson"
>
> Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 12:43:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Return value of consume_ev_sig_nb() not
> handled ?
>
> Hi Matt,
Hi,
This week, coverity analysis reports 0 eliminated defects and 0 new defects
Analysis summary report:
Files analyzed : 474
Total LoC input to cov-analyze : 192482
Functions analyzed : 4610
Paths analyzed : 698867
All details
10 matches
Mail list logo