Daniel Gryniewicz [d...@redhat.com] wrote:
> On 04/05/2016 01:34 PM, Malahal Naineni wrote:
> > Csaba Dobo [dobocs...@gmail.com] wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> as far as I know this container is running in privileged mode according
> >> to:
> >> cat /proc/self/uid_map
> >> 0 0 42
On 04/05/2016 01:34 PM, Malahal Naineni wrote:
> Csaba Dobo [dobocs...@gmail.com] wrote:
>> Hi,
>> as far as I know this container is running in privileged mode according
>> to:
>> cat /proc/self/uid_map
>> 0 0 4294967295 menas priviledge, right?
>> but I am sure yo
Csaba Dobo [dobocs...@gmail.com] wrote:
>Hi,
>as far as I know this container is running in privileged mode according
>to:
>cat /proc/self/uid_map
>0 0 4294967295 menas priviledge, right?
>but I am sure you are right, but have no idea how to confirm what is the
>
>From Dominique Martinet :
Dominique Martinet has uploaded a new change for review.
https://review.gerrithub.io/271600
Change subject: 9P cleanup: allocate op_ctx for cleanup fid
..
9P cleanup: allocate op_ctx for cleanup fid
>From Dominique Martinet :
Dominique Martinet has uploaded a new change for review.
https://review.gerrithub.io/271601
Change subject: 9p: fix oob access in function name descriptions
..
9p: fix oob access in function name de
Hi Matt,
The workload is small files creation on specific interval. Create +
write in one thread, Later other thread will read + delete.
Since these are small files there is frequent open and close, To test
this I did just open and close and compared with both Kernel NFSv4 and
Ganesha.
I found ove
Hi Tushar,
Also relevant, what FSAL are you using, and how is that FSAL provisioned (e.g.,
if VFS, what is underneath it).
Matt
- Original Message -
> From: "Tushar Shinde"
> To: "Matt Benjamin"
> Cc: nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 10:30:16 AM
>
