[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: GLUSTER: make sure to free xstat when meeting error

2017-08-17 Thread GerritHub
>From Kinglong Mee : Kinglong Mee has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/374748 Change subject: GLUSTER: make sure to free xstat when meeting error .. GLUSTER: make sure to

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: GLUSTER: make sure to free xstat when meeting error

2017-08-17 Thread GerritHub
>From Kinglong Mee : Kinglong Mee has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/374747 Change subject: GLUSTER: make sure to free xstat when meeting error .. GLUSTER: make sure to

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Announce Push of V2.6-dev.5

2017-08-17 Thread Frank Filz
Branch next Tag:V2.6-dev.5 Release Highlights * Reduce severity level of trace "Export entry is not cached" * Removed lines which increase "q->size" after lru_insert() * Fix root squashing for NFSv3 * config: add config_url and RADOS url provider * Close dbus connection during shutdown

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: DBUS interface for purging idmapper cache.

2017-08-17 Thread GerritHub
>From : rishabhs...@gmail.com has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/374727 Change subject: DBUS interface for purging idmapper cache. .. DBUS interface for purging idmapper

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2

2017-08-17 Thread Matt Benjamin
I'm confused, napalm is 2.6-dev, not 2.5.x On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Frank Filz wrote: > Actually, the problem was Bill’s Napalm… > > > > I was able to make sense of the manual merge for > > > > ff98ea64b6d1228443a35b2f7ceb3c61c0a0c1d1 Build libntirpc package

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2

2017-08-17 Thread Frank Filz
Actually, the problem was Bill’s Napalm… I was able to make sense of the manual merge for ff98ea64b6d1228443a35b2f7ceb3c61c0a0c1d1 Build libntirpc package when not using system ntirpc But not for 6bd32da613e26a768ac1dc4db1001395bd10c295 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2

2017-08-17 Thread Frank Filz
Ok, I’ll have a look at backporting this afternoon. Frank From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 10:39 AM To: Frank Filz Cc: Matt Benjamin ; Soumya Koduri ; nfs-ganesha-devel

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2

2017-08-17 Thread Malahal Naineni
I did but the failover/failback code re-org looked like contributed, but I am not positive. On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Frank Filz wrote: > Hmm, did you cherry pick in the original order? > > > > I’ll take a look at this later today. > > > > Frank > > > > *From:*

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2

2017-08-17 Thread Frank Filz
Hmm, did you cherry pick in the original order? I’ll take a look at this later today. Frank From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 11:34 PM To: Matt Benjamin Cc: Frank Filz ; Soumya Koduri

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] v2.6-dev-4 leaves 271 threads hanging around

2017-08-17 Thread Malahal Naineni
Bill, I tried to reproduce without gdb. It goes down after few seconds (around 30) due to svc_rqst_epoll_loop() waiting for about 29 seconds. I tried with gdb as well, it came out too. I saw only few threads (about 10) after sending the signal. Can you tell me how I can reproduce without 'gdb' ?

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] FW: Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: Fix root squashing for NFSv3

2017-08-17 Thread Frank Filz
This patch will need to be backported as part of V2.5.2. It’s a pretty serious regression included in the patches going in. Frank From: GerritHub [mailto:supp...@gerritforge.com] Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 2:44 AM Subject: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: Fix root

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: Napalm nfs_worker_thread NFS_REQUEST queue

2017-08-17 Thread William Allen Simpson
This was originally a separate patch, integrated into Napalm dispatch, then split out again to make the patches easier to read. It's been tested and re-tested in the CI dozens of times. It's ready for today. This is the last queue removal piece that allows us to begin working on async and

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: Napalm nfs_worker_thread NFS_REQUEST queue

2017-08-17 Thread GerritHub
>From : william.allen.simp...@gmail.com has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/374652 Change subject: Napalm nfs_worker_thread NFS_REQUEST queue .. Napalm

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: WIP dev-4 test no change

2017-08-17 Thread William Allen Simpson
Works in dev.4a! Thanks, Malahal. On 8/13/17 8:07 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote: I was trying to test my next code, and had strange ASan results. So I dropped back to dev-4; it compiles, but never terminates. So I made this WIP test with no change, and CI doesn't even compile

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] v2.6-dev-4 leaves 271 threads hanging around

2017-08-17 Thread William Allen Simpson
On 8/15/17 11:53 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote: Rather than spam the entire list, if anybody wants the gdb bt. I can send the ganesha.log, too, but it's bigger. To test, rm the log, setup the libraries, gdb, run -F -- and on another connection pkill ganesha. Nothing else. That's always my

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: Fix root squashing for NFSv3

2017-08-17 Thread GerritHub
>From Malahal : Malahal has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/374621 Change subject: Fix root squashing for NFSv3 .. Fix root squashing for NFSv3 We modify export_perms.options

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2

2017-08-17 Thread Malahal Naineni
Dan, I backported everything that was needed except the following 2 as I don't want to mess with cmake! Can you please quickly send ported patches? Appreciate your help. The latest V2.5 code is at my personal github branch V2.5-stable: https://github.com/malahal/nfs-ganesha/commits/V2.5-stable