[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: GLUSTER: return the correct status at direrr

>From Kinglong Mee : Kinglong Mee has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/383528 Change subject: GLUSTER: return the correct status at direrr .. GLUSTER: return the correct

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: Replace "thread name" with request number for workers

>From Frank Filz : Frank Filz has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/383519 Change subject: Replace "thread name" with request number for workers .. Replace "thread name"

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: RADOS config url: late init RADOS parameters

>From Matt Benjamin : Matt Benjamin has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/383500 Change subject: RADOS config url: late init RADOS parameters .. RADOS config url: late init

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] ABBA deadlock in 2.5 (likely in 2.6 as well)

Sounds good, will give it a try with nasty "racer". Thank you Dan. Regards, Malahal. On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > Maybe something like this: > > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/CptGkmoRutBKYjno5FiSjg/ > > Daniel > > > On 10/23/2017 10:13

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: Don't allow rename that makes an object as parent of itself

>From Malahal : Malahal has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/383492 Change subject: Don't allow rename that makes an object as parent of itself .. Don't allow rename that makes

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] ABBA deadlock in 2.5 (likely in 2.6 as well)

> Maybe something like this: > > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/CptGkmoRutBKYjno5FiSjg/ That looks like it should fix the problem. Frank > On 10/23/2017 10:13 AM, Malahal Naineni wrote: > > Let us say we have X/Y path in the file system. We have attr_lock and > > content_lock on each

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] ABBA deadlock in 2.5 (likely in 2.6 as well)

Maybe something like this: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/CptGkmoRutBKYjno5FiSjg/ Daniel On 10/23/2017 10:13 AM, Malahal Naineni wrote: Let us say we have X/Y path in the file system. We have attr_lock and content_lock on each object. The locks we are interested here are attr_lock on X

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: Safeguard call to uncache_nfs4_owner

>From Sachin Punadikar : Sachin Punadikar has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/383468 Change subject: Safeguard call to uncache_nfs4_owner .. Safeguard call to

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Ganesha 2.3 - assert in dec_state_owner_ref

Hi All, A customer observing assert for Ganesha 2.3 code base as shown below in the back trace: (gdb) where #0 0x7fbf55cb31d7 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x7fbf55cb48c8 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x7fbf55cac146 in __assert_fail_base () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #3

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] ABBA deadlock in 2.5 (likely in 2.6 as well)

Let us say we have X/Y path in the file system. We have attr_lock and content_lock on each object. The locks we are interested here are attr_lock on X (hear after referred to as AX) and content_lock on X (hear after CX). Similarly we have AY and CY for object named Y. 1. Thread 50 (lookup called

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Ganesha 2.3 - assert in dec_state_owner_ref

Hi All, A customer observing assert for Ganesha 2.3 code base as shown below in the back trace: (gdb) where #0 0x7fbf55cb31d7 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x7fbf55cb48c8 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x7fbf55cac146 in __assert_fail_base () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #3

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: reaper: fix nfs_in_grace() check

>From Jeff Layton : Jeff Layton has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/383446 Change subject: reaper: fix nfs_in_grace() check .. reaper: fix nfs_in_grace() check Fix braino in

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: WIP/scripts: Multilock test for Gluster

>From Soumya : Soumya has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/383437 Change subject: WIP/scripts: Multilock test for Gluster .. WIP/scripts: Multilock test for Gluster Change-Id: