Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] rpcping profile

2018-03-25 Thread Matt Benjamin
With N=10 and num_calls=100, on Lemon, test_rbt averages 2.8M reqs/s. That's about half the rate when N=1, which I think is expected. If this is really an available rbt in-order search-remove-insert retire rate when N is 10, my intuition would be it's sufficiently fast not to be

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] rpcping profile

2018-03-25 Thread Matt Benjamin
1 What is the peak outstanding size of outstanding calls 1.1 if e.g. > 100k is that correct: as last week, why would a sensible client issue more than e.g. 1000 calls without seeing replies? 1.3 if outstanding calls is <= 1, why can test_rbt retire millions of duty cycles / s in that

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] rpcping profile

2018-03-25 Thread William Allen Simpson
On 3/24/18 7:50 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote: Noting that the top problem is exactly my prediction by knowledge of the code:   clnt_req_callback() opr_rbtree_insert() The second is also exactly as expected:   svc_rqst_expire_insert() opr_rbtree_insert() svc_rqst_expire_cmpf() These are

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] rpcping profile

2018-03-24 Thread William Allen Simpson
Using local file tests/rpcping. Using local file ../profile. Total: 989 samples 321 32.5% 32.5% 321 32.5% svc_rqst_expire_cmpf 149 15.1% 47.5% 475 48.0% opr_rbtree_insert 139 14.1% 61.6% 140 14.2% __writev 56 5.7% 67.2% 66 6.7%