[Nfs-ganesha-devel] pynfs fslocations tests failure

Hi, I was testing the pynfs fslocations tests on latest code base with VFS mounts on ext4 and have found that most of the tests fail. Are these known issues? Please find the command and the output below > showmount –e Export list for localhost.localdomain: /exports/default (everyone)

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] READDIR doesn't return all entries.

Hi Frank/Sachin, I will get back to you with tcpdump/logs if I can recreate it. It was around 2000 directories and a "find" from the export root was issued before the "ls" from client. Thanks, Pradeep On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Frank Filz wrote: > What FSAL? Is

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: gtest/test_unlink_latency: unlink latency microbenchmark

>From Girjesh Rajoria : Girjesh Rajoria has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/34 Change subject: gtest/test_unlink_latency: unlink latency microbenchmark ..

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: NFS: fix delegation conflict check in open4_ex

>From Jeff Layton : Jeff Layton has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/399936 Change subject: NFS: fix delegation conflict check in open4_ex .. NFS: fix delegation conflict

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] READDIR doesn't return all entries.

You still don’t mention FSAL… I’m suspecting non-unique cookies from the FSAL as a cause. You may want to turn on CACHE_INODE and NFS_READDIR to FULL_DEBUG to see what is going on. A tcpdump trace won’t show anything useful (since we won’t see what cookies are being provided for the missing

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] nfs ganesha vs nfs kernel performance

How many clients are you using? Each client op can only (currently) be handled in a single thread, and client's won't send more ops until the current one is ack'd, so Ganesha can basically only parallelize on a per-client basis at the moment. I'm sure there are locking issues; so far we've

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] owner and group issue.

Thanks! we will add support_ex functionality in our fsal as part of that will see if the issue in question goes away. On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Frank Filz wrote: > If you are not using open2, then file creation could easily be wonky. Also > note that the

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] nfs ganesha vs nfs kernel performance

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:00:52AM +, Deepak Jagtap wrote: > > What is the actual test? > >- nfs server: RHEL based host exporting ext3 formated SSD. > >- nfs client: RHEL based host running windows vm IOmeter with 70% read, > 30% random workload, 2 worker threads doing IOs with 64

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] nfs ganesha vs nfs kernel performance

Hi Frank, I tried both 2.6 and 2.5-stable. 2.6 showed marginal improvements at-least for my workload (improvement of ~1K for 70% read, 30% random workload). -Deepak From: Frank Filz Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 7:26:50 AM To:

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] nfs ganesha vs nfs kernel performance

> What is the actual test? - nfs server: RHEL based host exporting ext3 formated SSD. - nfs client: RHEL based host running windows vm IOmeter with 70% read, 30% random workload, 2 worker threads doing IOs with 64 outstanding IO queue depth each. > What are the export options in the

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] testing

--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: "mdc_lookup" do not dispatch to FSAL

>From Sachin Punadikar : Sachin Punadikar has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/400037 Change subject: "mdc_lookup" do not dispatch to FSAL .. "mdc_lookup" do not dispatch to

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Ganesha V2.5.2: mdcache high open_fd_count

Yeah, that worked and I don't see this going below -1. So initializing it to a non-zero value have avoided this for now. But I still see the 4k fd limit being exhausted after 24hrs of IO. My setup currently shows open_fd_count=13k but there are only 30 files. # ls -al /proc/25832/fd | wc -l 559

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] nfs ganesha vs nfs kernel performance

As Bill said, it is not applicable to V2.6. It is there in V2.5 (yes, please see src/config_samples/config.txt in that version for details). On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 4:50 AM, Deepak Jagtap wrote: > Thanks Malahal, William! > > > Tried both v2.5-stable and 2.6 (next