Re: AW: RE: slow https performance compared to http

2016-11-14 Thread adrhc
Lukas Tribus Wrote: --- > > I'll do it but I guess the test will no longer be so relevant > because I want > > to simulate different users. > > Real user/browser DO keep-alive. ... I agree but I think that separate/different simultaneous users

RE: AW: RE: slow https performance compared to http

2016-11-13 Thread Reinis Rozitis
> ab does not support TLS tickets (you can verify this with wireshark), so even > if > you do enable HTTP keepalive, the full TLS handshake has to be performed for > each request. > > it's a poor tool to measure total potential throughout of HTTPS servers. Now that you mention it I kind of remem

Re: AW: RE: slow https performance compared to http

2016-11-13 Thread Robert Paprocki
> Enabling keepalive on ab is one of the things you can do. I don't know > ab, so not sure if there is a better way. I also do not know if ab supports > SSL session caching or TLS tickets, which you would have to keep in > mind when benchmarking. ab does not support TLS tickets (you can verify th