Re: failover to the next upstream server if one of the servers is slow

2018-06-23 Thread itpp2012
Can't tell atm. if a timeout forces a node to become offline but 60s is still along time to wait (and decide) without actually knowing if a node is overloaded (it might be just busy which does not always mean overloaded). There are tools for fi. edge routers which polls a status page to decide to

Re: failover to the next upstream server if one of the servers is slow

2018-06-22 Thread ebondar
Thanks itpp2012, I'll look at LUA if I understand correctly, we can not specify the timeout of the session to upstream the server, initiate a timeout error, and force requests to move to another server? proxy_read_timeout 1; -> proxy_next_upstream error timeout Posted at Nginx Forum: https

Re: failover to the next upstream server if one of the servers is slow

2018-06-22 Thread itpp2012
You may have to resort to Lua (openresty) and periodically perform via a sub request a query which should indicate how fast an upstream is and decide weather to take it offline (which also can be done with Lua). Posted at Nginx Forum: https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,280259,280260#msg-280260 _

failover to the next upstream server if one of the servers is slow

2018-06-22 Thread ebondar
Hello, i'm trying to setup a failover configuration between two upstream servers, all works as expected. But i want to cover the case if one of the upstream servers is became a very slow and i want to remove this servers from rotation and move all requests to the second upstream server. upstream