Re: simple auth question for nested sections

Thanks Maxim for your lights! Please discard all the crap I wrote before and apologies to Jonathan, then. :oP --- *B. R.* On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote: > Hello! > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 06:17:44PM +0100, B.R. wrote: > > > I guess the docs logic is

Re: simple auth question for nested sections

On Mar 23, 2016, at 2:14 PM, Francis Daly wrote: > Any directives that inherit do not need to be repeated. > > If it does not work for you, that's probably due to proxy_pass not > inheriting. Thanks - that's it -- `proxy_pass` does not inherit, but all the `proxy_set_header` directives in

Re: simple auth question for nested sections

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 08:00:13PM -0400, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: Hi there, > Is there a syntax for nesting the two together, so the /foo/admin would > inherit the /foo configuration without the need to redeclare everything? > > # something like > location /foo { >

simple auth question for nested sections

apologies for the simple question, but i could only find the opposite situation in the list archives and I haven't had to reconfigure some of these routes in years! i have # works location /foo { proxy_pass http://127.0.0.1:6543; } I want to lock down