Re: Unit 1.2 release
On 07.06.18 18:07, Valentin V. Bartenev wrote: > Feature: configuration of environment variables for application > processes. My thanks to the Unit team, this new feature is going to save me a lot of headaches. -Ralph ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Re: increase video image size
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 05:15:57AM -0400, neuronetv wrote:
> Roman Arutyunyan Wrote:
> ---
>
> > Something like this should work:
> >
> > application /src {
> > live on;
> > exec_push ffmpeg -i rtmp://localhost/src/$name -c:a copy -c:v
> > libx264
> > -s 640x480 -f flv rtmp://localhost/dst/$name;
> > }
> >
> > application /dst {
> > # proceed here
> > }
> >
>
> thanks, does this go in my nginx.conf file?
Yes, it does.
> Posted at Nginx Forum:
> https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,280079,280097#msg-280097
>
> ___
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
--
Roman Arutyunyan
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Re: Performance of h2 is better than h2c
yes. Both are running in different machines. OS used is ubuntu 14.04 Posted at Nginx Forum: https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,280098,280100#msg-280100 ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Re: Performance of h2 is better than h2c
Is your client running n a different host than your server? > On 8 Jun 2018, at 5:35 AM, prabhat wrote: > > I am taking performance data on nginx. > The client I used is h2load > > Request per second using h2 is much higher than h2c. But I think it should > not be as h2 is having the overhead of ssl. > I have used the command > ./h2load https://xx.xx.xx.xx:4070 -n50 -c1000 -t50 --- h2 > ./h2load http://xx.xx.xx.xx:4090 -n50 -c1000 -t50 --- h2c > > and at the server side config is > http2_max_concurrent_streams 60;- > http2_max_requests 60; > http2_streams_index_size 524288; > > The h2c is getting 23008.09 req/sec and h2 96091.85 req/sec > > The request is for default page provided with nginx instalation > > Posted at Nginx Forum: > https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,280098,280098#msg-280098 > > ___ > nginx mailing list > nginx@nginx.org > http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Performance of h2 is better than h2c
I am taking performance data on nginx. The client I used is h2load Request per second using h2 is much higher than h2c. But I think it should not be as h2 is having the overhead of ssl. I have used the command ./h2load https://xx.xx.xx.xx:4070 -n50 -c1000 -t50 --- h2 ./h2load http://xx.xx.xx.xx:4090 -n50 -c1000 -t50 --- h2c and at the server side config is http2_max_concurrent_streams 60;- http2_max_requests 60; http2_streams_index_size 524288; The h2c is getting 23008.09 req/sec and h2 96091.85 req/sec The request is for default page provided with nginx instalation Posted at Nginx Forum: https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,280098,280098#msg-280098 ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Re: increase video image size
Roman Arutyunyan Wrote:
---
> Something like this should work:
>
> application /src {
> live on;
> exec_push ffmpeg -i rtmp://localhost/src/$name -c:a copy -c:v
> libx264
> -s 640x480 -f flv rtmp://localhost/dst/$name;
> }
>
> application /dst {
> # proceed here
> }
>
thanks, does this go in my nginx.conf file?
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,280079,280097#msg-280097
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Re: [nginx] Added r->schema.
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 11:29:05AM +0800, 洪志道 wrote:
> Hi.
>
> diff -r 8e6bb4e6045f src/http/ngx_http_variables.c
> --- a/src/http/ngx_http_variables.c Thu Jun 07 20:04:22 2018 +0300
> +++ b/src/http/ngx_http_variables.c Thu Jun 07 12:20:05 2018 -0400
> @@ -1420,25 +1420,11 @@
> ngx_http_variable_scheme(ngx_http_request_t *r,
> ngx_http_variable_value_t *v, uintptr_t data)
> {
> -#if (NGX_HTTP_SSL)
> -
> -if (r->connection->ssl) {
> -v->len = sizeof("https") - 1;
> -v->valid = 1;
> -v->no_cacheable = 0;
> -v->not_found = 0;
> -v->data = (u_char *) "https";
> -
> -return NGX_OK;
> -}
> -
> -#endif
> -
> -v->len = sizeof("http") - 1;
> v->valid = 1;
> v->no_cacheable = 0;
> v->not_found = 0;
> -v->data = (u_char *) "http";
> +v->len = r->schema.len;
> +v->data = r->schema.data;
>
> return NGX_OK;
> }
>
> Thanks.
A similar patch has already been considered and rejected:
https://trac.nginx.org/nginx/ticket/1549#comment:5
See also https://trac.nginx.org/nginx/ticket/711.
___
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
