RE: Do nginx 1.14 and 1.17 have compatible configuration file formats?

Thanks Lucas. Basic test showed it work on 1.17 with my old 1.14 config. But is there any official announcement that the nginx has backward compatibility from X version to Y version? Best Regards SSP->LSE->Clear Linux Engineering (Shanghai) From: nginx [mailto:nginx-boun...@nginx.org] On

Re: unit и его лог

Я прошу прощения, но все же можно ли выдрать по мотивам последнего патча хоть что-то еще, что, вероятно, вернул интерпретатор? Не только код, но может быть и хоть какое-то сообщение, а-ля дебаг-хардкор-только не в продакшн? Все exception в коде всегда имеют сообщение, но 500-е коды продолжаются.

[njs] Added unit_test target.

details: https://hg.nginx.org/njs/rev/d1fb99f23174 branches: changeset: 1049:d1fb99f23174 user: Dmitry Volyntsev date: Mon Jul 15 18:46:31 2019 +0300 description: Added unit_test target. diffstat: auto/make | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diffs (21

[njs] Unifying makefile target names.

details: https://hg.nginx.org/njs/rev/18396fcfd53b branches: changeset: 1050:18396fcfd53b user: Dmitry Volyntsev date: Mon Jul 15 19:20:55 2019 +0300 description: Unifying makefile target names. diffstat: auto/expect | 4 ++-- auto/make | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3

[njs] Added memory-sanitizer support.

details: https://hg.nginx.org/njs/rev/3594adcc9b05 branches: changeset: 1048:3594adcc9b05 user: Dmitry Volyntsev date: Mon Jul 15 17:46:37 2019 +0300 description: Added memory-sanitizer support. diffstat: auto/clang | 13 + njs/test/njs_unit_test.c |

Re: unit и его лог

On Sunday 14 July 2019 22:09:01 Anton Kiryushkin wrote: > Валентин, спасибо, за ваш совет, пересобрал Unit и получил довольно > загадочную картину. К примеру. > Вот сообщение в логе Unit: > 2019/07/15 00:02:48.152 [warn] 20971#20971 [unit] #174772: application > returned 500 response > > Окей,

[njs] Fixed incorrect optimization in njs_string_to_c_string().

details: https://hg.nginx.org/njs/rev/3b3e3c133d13 branches: changeset: 1047:3b3e3c133d13 user: Alexander Borisov date: Mon Jul 15 17:45:23 2019 +0300 description: Fixed incorrect optimization in njs_string_to_c_string(). diffstat: njs/njs_string.c | 4 1 files changed, 0

[njs] Tests: reporting unit tests statistics.

details: https://hg.nginx.org/njs/rev/e89f5a5709e0 branches: changeset: 1046:e89f5a5709e0 user: Dmitry Volyntsev date: Mon Jul 15 16:20:41 2019 +0300 description: Tests: reporting unit tests statistics. diffstat: njs/test/njs_unit_test.c | 168

[njs] Tests: passing unit tests options in a struct.

details: https://hg.nginx.org/njs/rev/9fc79481e32d branches: changeset: 1045:9fc79481e32d user: Dmitry Volyntsev date: Mon Jul 15 15:54:41 2019 +0300 description: Tests: passing unit tests options in a struct. diffstat: njs/test/njs_unit_test.c | 99

Re: Do nginx 1.14 and 1.17 have compatible configuration file formats?

I would say, install a box with 1.17, copy your config, and do a config test to see if it works  From: nginx on behalf of "Zheng, Qi" Reply-To: "nginx@nginx.org" Date: Monday, 15 July 2019 at 10.46 To: "'nginx@nginx.org'" Subject: RE: Do nginx 1.14 and 1.17 have compatible configuration

RE: Do nginx 1.14 and 1.17 have compatible configuration file formats?

Hi, Can someone help answer my question? Or any other channel I can throw the question to? Many thanks. Best Regards SSP->LSE->Clear Linux Engineering (Shanghai) From: Zheng, Qi Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 9:04 AM To: nginx@nginx.org Subject: Do nginx 1.14 and 1.17 have compatible