details: https://hg.nginx.org/njs/rev/e023db05004f
branches:
changeset: 1934:e023db05004f
user: Dmitry Volyntsev
date: Wed Aug 24 17:04:58 2022 -0700
description:
Modules: sorting external object property descriptors alphabetically.
diffstat:
nginx/ngx_http_js_module.c | 357 ++
Hi Maxim,
On 8/25/22 00:14, Maxim Dounin wrote:
[...]
in most production setups
it makes no difference, yet used to introduce various issues.
The only one I can think of is security, since you don't have file
permissions, but one could also argue that the security can't be lower
than that of
Hello!
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 08:15:40PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Hello Maxim!
>
> On 8/24/22 18:00, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> [...]
> >> For having nginx as a reverse proxy in front of a server, such as unit,
> >> it's faster to communicate through Unix sockets (UDS), rather than TCP
> >>
Hello!
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 07:38:02PM +0200, Dipl. Ing. Sergey Brester via
nginx-devel wrote:
> it seems that the question of precedence of non-conditional _return_
> directive vs nested _location_s is not really clear,
> or rather some constellations (like fallback) are impossible or else t
Hello Maxim!
On 8/24/22 18:00, Maxim Dounin wrote:
[...]
For having nginx as a reverse proxy in front of a server, such as unit,
it's faster to communicate through Unix sockets (UDS), rather than TCP
(localhost).
I would rather say "it's a common misconception that it's faster
to communicate t
OK,
regarding the "fallback" location, this one can be used (empty -
shortest match):
location "" {
return 444;
}
Regards,
Serg.
24.08.2022 19:38, Sergey Brester via nginx-devel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems that the question of precedence of non-conditional _return_
> directive vs nest
Hi,
it seems that the question of precedence of non-conditional _return_
directive vs nested _location_s is not really clear,
or rather some constellations (like fallback) are impossible or else the
configuration may look weird.
For instance:
server {
server_name ...;
location ~ ^/(some-
Hello!
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 05:21:48PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> On 8/24/22 16:58, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 01:00:26AM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> >
> >> I'll resend v4 in a moment, since it didn't arrive to the list.
> >>
>
Hi Maxim,
On 8/24/22 16:58, Maxim Dounin wrote:
Hello!
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 01:00:26AM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
I'll resend v4 in a moment, since it didn't arrive to the list.
On 8/23/22 23:18, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
Hi,
Patch set ready for review.
Both 'listen' and 'proxy_pass
Hello!
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 01:00:26AM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> I'll resend v4 in a moment, since it didn't arrive to the list.
>
> On 8/23/22 23:18, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Patch set ready for review.
> > Both 'listen' and 'proxy_pass' work fine, with the only cave
On 8/24/22 11:57, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
And of course this one didn't make it to the list either. See this mail
for knowing how it works.
Cheers,
Alex
On 8/23/22 23:56, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 8/23/22 23:18, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>> Alejandro Colomar (5):
>> Opt
And of course this one didn't make it to the list either. See this mail
for knowing how it works.
Cheers,
Alex
On 8/23/22 23:56, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 8/23/22 23:18, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>> Alejandro Colomar (5):
>>Optimize string copy in Unix sockets.
>>Use a mini
12 matches
Mail list logo
