Pretty cool.
I'm still reading up on each but can this also be done for https
termination? Is the SSL pre-read limitation the main issue there?
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023, 9:31 pm Stephen Farrell,
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been working on implementing TLS encrypted client hello
> (ECH, [1]) in the
- Mathew
On Wed, 31 May 2023, 12:15 pm Maxim Dounin, wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 01:26:35AM +1000, Mathew Heard wrote:
>
> > I've been going through the threadpool code for native modules in an
> > attempt to fix a third party module with what appears to be a
Hi,
I've been going through the threadpool code for native modules in an
attempt to fix a third party module with what appears to be a
use-after free error looking for inspiration.
I thought I would see a strategy to prevent thread pool tasks that are
in the queue for processing being freed when
But the way have you benchmarked this?
On Sun, 5 Mar 2023, 11:55 am Nick Bogdanov, wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Nick Bogdanov
> # Date 1677975659 28800
> # Sat Mar 04 16:20:59 2023 -0800
> # Node ID 8cb34ae16de2408cbe91832194baac6ae299f251
> # Parent
I really like the making safe of the error log as opposed to truncation.
The more information logged in cases like this the better.
Alternatively what about something that indicates further data was
truncated?
On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, 21:07 Dipl. Ing. Sergey Brester via nginx-devel, <
By the way have you seen sregex ? Given its built with many of the
same principles as nginx and PREG(1/2) compatible maybe it might be of
interest?
And Merry Christmas for those who celebrate.
On Sat, 25 Dec 2021 at 09:11, Maxim Dounin wrote:
>
> details:
If there are performance regressions perhaps these could be documented
in the events documentation. Something along the lines of a
recommended minimum kernel.
On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 at 11:48, Zhao, Ping wrote:
>
> Hi Maxim,
>
> It's been long time and I lost the mail thread. Is it now the good time
I'm just a user of nginx making a comment. Simple patch, valuable find,
potentially far reaching annoyance.
On Thu, 8 Jul 2021, 7:33 pm Jérémie Drouet,
wrote:
> Ok, so what should I do now? Does it mean it cannot be done?
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 11:31 AM Mathew Heard wrote:
>
&g
This should be a major release patch. It's breaking for everyone passing
the error log.
On Thu, 8 Jul 2021, 7:17 pm Jeremie Drouet,
wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Jeremie Drouet
> # Date 1625150632 -7200
> # Thu Jul 01 16:43:52 2021 +0200
> # Node ID
Kevin,
BoringSSL is already for the most part supported (in code, if not
officially) if I am not mistaken
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 12:02, Kevin Burke wrote:
> Hi,
> There has been a recent push by some members of the security community to
> try to make more critical code run in memory safe
SoYun,
Interesting patchset. Have you by chance also tested proxy_pass /
fastcgi_pass performance?
I'd be interested to know if the significant performance improvement was
due to filesystem interaction or socket.
Regards,
Mathew
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 19:43, SoYun Seong wrote:
> # HG
Hi All,
If anyone else is searching for a better solution to this bug (perhaps in
Apache) the following nginx patch works for me
https://github.com/splitice/nginx/commit/a91fdb43793f006bda06d980a89fd1dfb428ebee
Tested on 3 different ios devices and an Apache h2 backend.
Maxim,
Which patches / modules would you consider highly questionable?
On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 10:15 AM Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 09:02:20AM +1000, Mathew Heard wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > It is a reduced version (less additional module
triggering binary reloads is not enough, something has to happen
between them and I'm not yet sure what.
On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 8:52 AM Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 08:51:41PM +1000, Mathew Heard wrote:
>
> > Got a little bit further and confirmed
on; master_process on;
2800 is nginx.old, also (nginx/1.15.8) as we did 2 builds with slightly
different compile options.
The processes do not respond to nice kill signals, only a -9 was able to
kill it.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:38 AM Mathew Heard wrote:
> Yesterday one of my techs repor
Yesterday one of my techs reported that a production server had a nginx
worker sitting at 99.9% CPU usage in top and not accepting new connections
(but getting it's share distributed due to SO_REUSEPORT). I thought this
might be related.
The workers age was significantly older than it's peers so
2019 at 1:13 AM Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 11:04:50AM +1100, Mathew Heard wrote:
>
> > Hit a rather strange issue today on a production service where during a
> > configuration reload (evident by the worker processes in the process of
No I did not change the number of workers, or anything core.
The configuration change would have been related to a specific server block
(add/remove/update) as carried out by our tooling.
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 1:04 AM Valentin V. Bartenev wrote:
> On Friday 01 February 2019 11:04:50 Mat
, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Maxim Dounin <mdou...@mdounin.ru> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 10:56:31AM +1000, Mathew Heard wrote:
>
> > If this actually yields a decrease in start time while not introducing
> > other effects we would use it. Our start time of a
If this actually yields a decrease in start time while not introducing
other effects we would use it. Our start time of a couple minutes is
annoying at times.
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Andrew Borodin wrote:
> 2017-06-01 22:39 GMT+05:00 Maxim Dounin
20 matches
Mail list logo