(update DNS when the elapsed time since the last refresh is
perhaps 90% of the TTL)
* IPv4/6 ignore (useful for example when there's a v6 IP available but the
system/network doesn't support v6)
Cheers
Neil Craig (He/Him)
Lead Architect, BBC Digital Distribution
https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs
Thanks for confirming, that’s what I was expecting but wanted to confirm
as we have some teams who are keen to use ESNI.
Cheers
Neil Craig
Lead Technical Architect
BBC Online Technology Group
London W12 | BC4 A3
On 01/10/2019, 14:07, "nginx-devel on behalf of Maxim Dounin"
wrot
Hi
Do the NGINX team currently know if it's likely that NGINX will support ESNI
once e.g. OpenSSL supports it and if so, whether it'll need any work on the
NGINX side?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-esni/
Cheers
Neil Craig
Lead Technical Architect
BBC Online Technology Group
Hello
FWIW, I¹d appreciate a $upstream_bytes_sent var in ngx.
Cheers
Neil Craig
Lead Technical Architect | Online Technology Group
Broadcast Centre, London W12 7TQ | BC4 A3
Twitter: https://twitter.com/tdp_org
On 29/11/2018, 15:00, "nginx-devel on behalf of Maxim Dounin"
wrot
Awesome, that¹s exactly what I am looking for, thanks Maxim - much
appreciated!
Neil Craig
Lead Technical Architect
BBC Design + Engineering | OTG
Broadcast Centre, London W12 7TQ | BC4 A3
On 05/04/2018, 19:52, "nginx-devel on behalf of Maxim Dounin"
<nginx-devel-boun...@nginx.
sense now :-).
Cheers
Neil Craig
Lead Technical Architect
BBC Design + Engineering | OTG
Broadcast Centre, London W12 7TQ | BC4 A3
[cid:1470E654-D8D0-4A53-A0B0-628531702DD6]
From: Thomas Ward <tew...@dark-net.net<mailto:tew...@dark-net.net>>
Date: Thursday, 5 April 2018 at 16:56
To:
Hi
I build a customised nginx binary for my project, this is statically compiled
against openssl (via —with-openssl). Does anyone know if it’s possible to add a
configure option to enable specific ciphersuites? The OpenSSL docs are here:
WRT the below, he H2 RFC includes a new status code to deal with thus, 421:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7540#section-9.1.2
Client support is poor right no so it'd be good if sending 421 was optional
perhaps.
Cheers
Sent from my iPhone
On 8 Jun 2017, at 18:17, 洪志道