On Monday 25 March 2013 18:41:28 Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 06:15:56PM +0400, Valentin V. Bartenev wrote:
> > On Thursday 21 March 2013 08:04:24 Piotr Sikora wrote:
> > > Hey guys,
> > > attached patch changes "if" tests to use "== NGX_FILE_ERROR" instead of
> > > "==
Hello!
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 06:15:56PM +0400, Valentin V. Bartenev wrote:
> On Thursday 21 March 2013 08:04:24 Piotr Sikora wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> > attached patch changes "if" tests to use "== NGX_FILE_ERROR" instead of
> > "== -1" or "!= NGX_OK", because NGX_FILE_ERROR is defined as -1 on UN
On Thursday 21 March 2013 08:04:24 Piotr Sikora wrote:
> Hey guys,
> attached patch changes "if" tests to use "== NGX_FILE_ERROR" instead of
> "== -1" or "!= NGX_OK", because NGX_FILE_ERROR is defined as -1 on UNIX,
> but as 0 on Win32.
The patch looks good. I'll commit it as soon as Maxim acknowl
Hey guys,
attached patch changes "if" tests to use "== NGX_FILE_ERROR" instead of
"== -1" or "!= NGX_OK", because NGX_FILE_ERROR is defined as -1 on UNIX,
but as 0 on Win32.
This isn't much of an issue in patched code (only "ngx_fd_info()" test
is actually reachable on Win32 and in worst case it m
