Hello!
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 03:51:57PM +0200, Sergey Brester wrote:
> >Thanks, looks like a valid win32-related problem. See below for
> >comments about the patch.
>
> And why you come to this conclusion?
Because the code path in question is only followed on win32. On
Unix, workers are for
Thanks, looks like a valid win32-related problem. See below for
comments about the patch.
And why you come to this conclusion?
As this is a win32-only problem, please clearly describe this in
commit log. E.g., use "Win32: " prefix in the summary line.
Please also describe that this is win32-s
Hello!
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 04:50:19PM +0200, Sergey Brester wrote:
> Hi,
>
> enclosed you'll find a changeset with fix for wrong max_size in http file
> cache:
>
> max_size still in bytes in child workers, because cache init called in
> master (and cache->max_size does not corrected from ch
