Hello!
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 06:25:55PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 18:48 +0400, Maxim Dounin wrote:
>
> > > In real world Dovecot can already send some extra untagged replies if
> > > there is some trouble (e.g. heavy load) with its authentication process.
> >
Hi,
On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 18:48 +0400, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> > In real world Dovecot can already send some extra untagged replies if
> > there is some trouble (e.g. heavy load) with its authentication process.
> > What happens is:
> >
> > S: * OK Waiting for authentication process to respond..
>
Hello!
First of all, thank you for Dovecot!
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 03:53:16PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that the IMAP proxying code currently doesn't ignore extra
> untagged replies from the backend server. For example this would be a
> valid session:
>
> S: * OK Server
Hi,
I noticed that the IMAP proxying code currently doesn't ignore extra
untagged replies from the backend server. For example this would be a
valid session:
S: * OK Server ready
S: * NO We're having some load issues
C: a login {4}
S: * OK foo
S: + OK
S: * OK bar
C: user pass
S: * OK almost done
