On Monday 10 November 2014 09:54:13 Toshikuni Fukaya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (2014/11/08 0:59), Igor Sysoev wrote:
> > On 04 Nov 2014, at 14:18, Toshikuni Fukaya
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Upstream: support named location for X-Accel-Redirect.
> >
> > Could please you provide usage examples?
> >
> >
>
> Here
On 10 Nov 2014, at 03:54, Toshikuni Fukaya
wrote:
> (2014/11/08 0:59), Igor Sysoev wrote:
>> On 04 Nov 2014, at 14:18, Toshikuni Fukaya
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Upstream: support named location for X-Accel-Redirect.
>>
>> Could please you provide usage examples?
>>
>>
>
> Here is my (simplified)
Hi all,
Is someone else interested in providing feedback for my patch ?
Regards,
Thomas.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Thomas Calderon
wrote:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> I was not aware that some efforts were ongoing to use PKCS#11 devices with
> nginx.
> However, my experience with OpenSSL engine sup
Hello!
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:26:43PM -0800, Piotr Sikora wrote:
> Hey,
>
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Piotr Sikora
> > # Date 1414668641 25200
> > # Thu Oct 30 04:30:41 2014 -0700
> > # Node ID bb14c7659efb32d1d1f651bdf54a8c8157ef67f9
> > # Parent 87ada3ba1392fadaf4d9193b5d345
Hello!
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 03:54:20PM +0100, Thomas Calderon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is someone else interested in providing feedback for my patch ?
Dmitrii's patch is currently a primary candidate for inclusion. I
agree with Piotr - it looks much better as it doesn't introduce
additional d
Hello!
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 01:19:43PM -0800, Ari Aosved wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Ari Aosved
> # Date 1415392382 28800
> # Fri Nov 07 12:33:02 2014 -0800
> # Node ID 742fb1a59b705ba71f2bab5fede58ff5885ebc71
> # Parent 234c5ecb00c04c67bcbb4a3be45fd844f2289462
> Core: parse
Hi Maxim,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 03:54:20PM +0100, Thomas Calderon wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Is someone else interested in providing feedback for my patch ?
>
> Dmitrii's patch is currently a primary candidate for inclusion.
Are you sure that Dmitrii's patch will allow to use dedicated key-pairs
for each site declaration.
It was tested, example:
http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-devel/2014-October/006151.html
___
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
ht
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Dmitrii Pichulin wrote:
>
>> Are you sure that Dmitrii's patch will allow to use dedicated key-pairs
>> for each site declaration.
>>
>>
> It was tested, example:
>
> http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-devel/2014-October/006151.html
Indeed, but the example
Hello!
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 04:31:37AM -0700, Piotr Sikora wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Piotr Sikora
> # Date 1414668641 25200
> # Thu Oct 30 04:30:41 2014 -0700
> # Node ID bb14c7659efb32d1d1f651bdf54a8c8157ef67f9
> # Parent 87ada3ba1392fadaf4d9193b5d345c248be32f77
> Upstream
Hello!
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:18:44PM +0900, Toshikuni Fukaya wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Toshikuni Fukaya
> # Date 1415098583 -32400
> # Node ID 6f4517db02a8cd4068b9378bd93fe6290f54720d
> # Parent dff86e2246a53b0f4a61935cd5c8c0a0f66d0ca2
> Upstream: support named location for X-
Hey Maxim,
> I think that it would be better to preserve current style used in
> the proxy module by placing configuration directive handling into
> the block with other configuration directives, like this:
Looks good, thanks.
Best regards,
Piotr Sikora
_
Hello!
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Yichun Zhang (agentzh) wrote:
> Sorry again, it actually checked "c->buffered &
> NGX_HTTP_LOWLEVEL_BUFFERED". This condition is indeed too strong and
> I've made it check its own busy bufs instead.
>
Hmm, the problem here is more complicated than I original
Hi,
(2014/11/11 3:02), Maxim Dounin wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:18:44PM +0900, Toshikuni Fukaya wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Toshikuni Fukaya
# Date 1415098583 -32400
# Node ID 6f4517db02a8cd4068b9378bd93fe6290f54720d
# Parent dff86e2246a53b0f4a61935cd5c8c0a0f66d0ca2
Upst
14 matches
Mail list logo
