> Further, when access phase checker decides to skip the access phase when
> access is allowed by a handler, and needs to switch to the next phase - it
> does not need to switch to post-access phase, but rather to the phase after
> it. Hence n++ in the access phase case (and not in the post-acc
Sorry, typo. My question is why bypass post-access phase?
Jinhua Luo 于2021年9月4日周六 下午11:48写道：
>
> > Further, when access phase checker decides to skip the access phase when
> > access is allowed by a handler, and needs to switch to the next phase - it
> > does not need to switch to post-access p
Hello!
On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 11:51:26PM +0800, Jinhua Luo wrote:
> Sorry, typo. My question is why bypass post-access phase?
The post-access phase does nothing as long as access is allowed,
it is only needed with "satisfy any;" to reject the request with
the appropriate status code if no acc
