details: https://hg.nginx.org/njs/rev/98959158fe23
branches:
changeset: 1862:98959158fe23
user: Dmitry Volyntsev
date: Mon May 23 22:26:50 2022 -0700
description:
Fixed use-of-uninitialized-value introduced in beb180165976.
Found by Memory Sanitizer.
diffstat:
src/njs_object.h |
details: https://hg.nginx.org/njs/rev/f37972e95e17
branches:
changeset: 1861:f37972e95e17
user: Dmitry Volyntsev
date: Mon May 23 22:26:35 2022 -0700
description:
Fixed Object.prototype.constructor property handler with large heap.
Found by Memory Sanitizer.
diffstat:
Thanks a lot for the prompt action .
---
Lee
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 6:36 PM Konstantin Pavlov wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> On 23/05/2022 7:14 AM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now that Red Hat has released EL 9, please provide SRPMs and RPMs for EL 9.
> > The Red Hat clones like Rocky
Hello!
Below are patches for the nginx-1.22.0 release, and corresponding
changes to the site.
The nginx-1.22.0 release is based on nginx-1.21.6 with two
additional changes grafted from the default branch: copyright year
update and OpenSSL/zlib for win32 builds update.
(Note that applying
Hello!
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 12:24:16PM -0700, Dk Jack wrote:
> Hi,
> What is the significance of this alert in ngx_http_close_request
>
> if (r->count == 0) {
> ngx_log_error(NGX_LOG_ALERT, c->log, 0, "http request count is
> zero");
> }
>
> I am seeing this alert in my logs
Hi,
What is the significance of this alert in ngx_http_close_request
if (r->count == 0) {
ngx_log_error(NGX_LOG_ALERT, c->log, 0, "http request count is
zero");
}
I am seeing this alert in my logs in some cases.
Dk.
___
nginx-devel
Hello!
On 23/05/2022 7:14 AM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
Hi,
Now that Red Hat has released EL 9, please provide SRPMs and RPMs for EL 9.
The Red Hat clones like Rocky and Amla will also be released soon.
We want to test the Nginx installation before putting it into production.
RHEL 9 packages
Thank you, Maxim. Is there anything else I can do to help move this
along? The change is rather small and clearly follows the latest RFC,
so I would expect it to be uncontroversial.
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 8:26 PM Maxim Dounin wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 11:46:54AM +0200,
