Another one here using dynamic etags generated by the backend that are lost
during the gzip compression; it would indeed ve very nice to have the weak
etag support. The Last Modified header is not always a viable option.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Adam Arsenault
Hello Maxim,
If you provide a copy of your newer draft patch, I am willing to spend
time helping improve it as you see fit.
-Aaron Peschel
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Maxim Dounin mdou...@mdounin.ru wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 06:20:24PM -0700, Aaron Peschel wrote:
Hi Maxim,
Hi Maxim/Aaron,
Would love to see support for Weak Etags in nginx. The lack of support for
gzip + etags has been a major problem for us as we use etags for caching
(and need gzip to work with it) in a bunch of different place in our
application.
Let me know if there is anything I can do to help
Hello!
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 06:20:24PM -0700, Aaron Peschel wrote:
Hi Maxim,
Is the draft patch the same as the one that your posted in the
previous thread, or has more work been done since then?
The one I've posted is to ignore weak etags. The draft one is to
downgrade strict etags
Hi Maxim,
Is the draft patch the same as the one that your posted in the
previous thread, or has more work been done since then?
-Aaron Peschel
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Maxim Dounin mdou...@mdounin.ru wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 05:39:40PM -0700, Aaron Peschel wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 05:39:40PM -0700, Aaron Peschel wrote:
Hello,
I am interested in getting support for Weak ETags into the mainline.
There was some discussion previously in here previously that developed
a quick patch to add support. What additional functionality would be
Hello,
I am interested in getting support for Weak ETags into the mainline.
There was some discussion previously in here previously that developed
a quick patch to add support. What additional functionality would be
required and what steps should be followed to get weak etag
functionality added
