Well, this is embarrassing. The correct content type is actually
application/wasm. (application/webassembly was overruled because
Chromium went ahead with the other one.)
https://github.com/WebAssembly/spec/issues/573
Best,
Niklas
On 02.02.2018 16:03, Niklas Fiekas wrote:
Dear maintainers
Dear maintainers,
please consider adding the application/webassembly content type for wasm
files.
With this header recent browsers allow streaming compilation.
Best regards,
Niklas
# HG changeset patch
# User Niklas Fiekas <niklas.fie...@backscattering.de>
# Date 1517582661 -3600
#