Hello!
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 04:16:53PM +0100, Niklas Fiekas wrote:
> Well, this is embarrassing. The correct content type is actually
> application/wasm. (application/webassembly was overruled because
> Chromium went ahead with the other one.)
>
>
Well, this is embarrassing. The correct content type is actually
application/wasm. (application/webassembly was overruled because
Chromium went ahead with the other one.)
https://github.com/WebAssembly/spec/issues/573
Best,
Niklas
On 02.02.2018 16:03, Niklas Fiekas wrote:
Dear maintainers,