Most System documents have two links following each "section":
_Source_ _Edit_
Clicking on the `Edit` link will create a new Pull Request with the changes you
make
Pull request on the devel branch of
[https://github.com/nim-lang/nim](https://github.com/nim-lang/nim)
What is the proper way to contribute to the documentation of the standard
library?
> Writing `from blah import nil` for every import is ugly
Probably less idiomatic/encouraged way should not be absolutely the same easy,
as more idiomatic. So two extra words for the whole imports list should be OK,
it could be like this: `from xxx, yyy import nil`.
Looks like my `load` macro example has become `require` [on
Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/nim/comments/6p0q72/help_with_a_macro/) (which
I am now boycotting, along with the rest of social media, due to the
_still_-unexplained [shadow censorship
@Libman Oh man, I've spend this whole day learning about how macros in Nim work
only to recreate the exact same macro you've listed. Only I used `require` for
its name.
Too bad it doesn't read args from the next line like usual sections can.
> Yeah, unused imports still increase binary size despite deadCodeElim
> (--d:release --opt:size). In a perfect world that would not be the case...
How so? That needs to be fixed then.
> if the condition is never met importing xyz is wasteful
Yeah, unused imports still increase binary size despite deadCodeElim
(`--d:release` `--opt:size`). In a perfect world that would not be the case...
* * *
> you can use `from math import nil`
Yup. But I
Semi-related to this discussion:
I just added Nim to the "Languages" section of Wikipedia's [[[Comparison of
regular expression
engines]]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_regular_expression_engines).
Someone more knowledgeable may wish to review and complete the "Language
I use ubuntu (well, xubuntu... technically). I doubt it's a bug on their side.
Someone else would have tripped over this way before I would have and fixed it
too.
10 matches
Mail list logo
