Term Rewriting Templates?.
You are welcome.
Plus another side note: Nim templates _are_ (what C calls) macros albeit pimped
up and cleaner. One important point to remember is that templates (unlike Nim
macros) are basically but smart text substitution. This also means that any
variables one refers to must either be defin
Exactly what I wanted. I've tried this before:
template POP: int =
result = stack[p]
dec p
Run
and realized it won't work, then I went in the wrong direction (to put it in
one line)...
That solves my probem, many thanks to you all.
Did you mean "textual substitution" instead?
Also, reading manual about
[template](https://nim-lang.org/docs/manual.html#templates) should provide you
ideas on how you can do with it.
If your `stack` and `p` are defined globally and at the beginning (before
`PUSH` and `POP` procs), you can do as simple as:
var
stack: array[10, int]
p = -1
proc PUSH(v: int) =
inc p
stack[p] = v
proc POP: int =
result = stack[p]
This should do what you want:
template push(val: int) =
stack[p] = val
p.inc()
template pop(): int =
p.dec()
stack[p]
Run
The relevant point isn't the stack logic (p++ vs p--) but that a template that
is supposed to "return" something is
Hello everyone! I'm hand-writing a "stack" located in runtime function "stack"
for some CPU-intensive task. What I wish to achieve is something like:
proc main =
# in my case no need for boundary check
stack = array[10, int]
p = -1
# define some operations lik
